5.3.14 kernel available

Tried running inxi this morning just get errors.

Unmatched right curly bracket at /usr/local/bin/inxi line 20018, at end of line
syntax error at /usr/local/bin/inxi line 20018, near "}"
Unmatched right curly bracket at /usr/local/bin/inxi line 20019, at end of line
Can't redeclare "my" in "my" at /usr/local/bin/inxi line 20022, near "my"
Global symbol "$b_gcc" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my $b_gcc"?) at /usr/local/bin/inxi line 20028.
Global symbol "%data" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my %data"?) at /usr/local/bin/inxi line 20029.

and so on..

@ anticapitalista

This was a full install of antiX19 all is standard apart from sgfxi install of nvidia 440.36 and i3.

No (antiX19 buster) just tried with Debian 10 and it inxi work fine.

After the preinstalled version on anitX19 gave errors I tried reinstall installing with cd /usr/local/bin && wget -Nc smxi.org/inxi && chmod +x inxi and not installing giving errors.

Yet with Debian 10 I install inxi with cd /usr/local/bin && wget -Nc smxi.org/inxi && chmod +x inxi & it installs plus works.

I will try uninstall inxi all together from antiX19 then reinstalling.

Thanks for your reply.

Ok I get this apt-get purge smxi-inxi-antix && apt-get install smxi-inxi-antix command ago.

I find something interesting but as I see from your purge command and synaptic its self that the inxi script has been written for antiX and is not the full inxi install. Plus the script is part of control-centre as in smxi-inxi-anti 0.4.18 and inxi-gui-antix 0.3.7 so if you try to remove inxi from synaptic it removes control-centre as well. Also you can’t install inxi 3.032-1-1 from synaptic as it complains about over riding the smxi-inxi-antix script and will remove control-panel also.

And yes your purse command worked Thank You

Referring to issue of memory usage in 5.3.14 anti brought up in another thread (New Kernels Available) I have a question to experts (I am not one at all):
Running ps_mem.py for antiX with 4.9 and 5.3.14 shows twice total memory used, which is reported neither by conky mem nor Htop. I think ps_mem was designed to more accurately report memory as used by running processes, with a split between private and shared.
Inspecting memory use values for processes between antiX 19 kernel 4.9 and 5.3.14 seems to show roughly the same private memory use but way much higher shared memory. This seems what is happening across all processes…
So my question is: What is causing that processes in antiX with kernel 5.3.14 are using multiple times the amount of shared memory than in case of kernel 4.9 or kernel 5.2 (as ps_mem shows reported by anti)?
Such radical shift in shared memory use seems between antiX with kernel 5.2 and 5.3. It seems that a point release difference of kernel would not be expected to cause such radical change…

Such radical shift in shared memory use seems between antiX with kernel 5.2 and 5.3

websearch:
memory usage 5.2 5.3 linux kernel

various quirks have been widely reported against 5.3.x
Reputedly, most of ’em have been addressed (resolved) in the 5.4.x branch