(solved) AntiX17 apt upgrade: Hash Sum mismatch

Forum Forums New users New Users and General Questions (solved) AntiX17 apt upgrade: Hash Sum mismatch

  • This topic has 9 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated Jan 8-8:19 pm by Anonymous.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4767
    Anonymous

      Hello All,

      It’s been awhile since I’ve used a debian based system, but when I try to update and upgrade I get this:

      E: Failed to fetch http://repo.antixlinux.com/testing/pool/main/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20171114.1-1mx17+1_amd64.deb  Hash Sum mismatch
         Hashes of expected file:
          - SHA256:cabad7f7ebd680bf6a81279bbbe18bbc4fee947c6697fe563b9b5498b4abc994
          - SHA1:5121c49e94226ffd2b5f97933977b41e0e892e03 [weak]
          - MD5Sum:6fd75bd2acddadbfe14bf5d3f49214d3 [weak]
          - Filesize:9768430 [weak]
         Hashes of received file:
          - SHA256:221484b4fc2d7dafa5a6ce9d907622cb7a956cdedf4ed5bf044ecde4d29c6ed8
          - SHA1:006e668cf0321ec5f5424ca01ed65e46f24542f9 [weak]
          - MD5Sum:47b0af7914c2d3bec6c77b3adbd6f3c6 [weak]
          - Filesize:9768430 [weak]
         Last modification reported: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 20:59:18 +0000
      E: Failed to fetch http://repo.antixlinux.com/testing/pool/main/i/icewm-themes-antix/icewm-themes-antix_0.2.8_all.deb  Hash Sum mismatch
         Hashes of expected file:
          - SHA256:6949d42fb76d60cced5518646e980d56ac9bc94b33ccd7f642bd33848935eb8e
          - SHA1:1234fb3eefbef6f723650e59aa666d4ef022c76d [weak]
          - MD5Sum:30c5ab4c62a4e225165a449d91c11137 [weak]
          - Filesize:770828 [weak]
         Hashes of received file:
          - SHA256:e992fbc293d6798d11dfd4b4d63f52851f89c7d2a64611a3e797835967cbd4bb
          - SHA1:1a39610377a7f4d89074dae20ffa4bded6fd5dc0 [weak]
          - MD5Sum:927c91c6deea11ae8881ce1fd6e23611 [weak]
          - Filesize:770828 [weak]
         Last modification reported: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 17:53:00 +0000
      E: Failed to fetch http://repo.antixlinux.com/testing/pool/nosystemd/x/xorg-server/xserver-xorg-core_1.19.5-1.0nosystemd1_amd64.deb  Hash Sum mismatch
         Hashes of expected file:
          - SHA256:ecd6e8b97d7e9280d72da8057e2faaab0bc835535bf7ee1449405d17adf0ab6d
          - SHA1:d3bcded9e8d77feb124fd039cc28e107491ed6ba [weak]
          - MD5Sum:ea519ffba6f9230e3705eda18da79c04 [weak]
          - Filesize:3395186 [weak]
         Hashes of received file:
          - SHA256:a3c280f565c8782a2961be3f18979f6e6208455ff1e25f372bcab0acd705c9b3
          - SHA1:4a9a40c8fd60de02516d587076e1bbdffd937d14 [weak]
          - MD5Sum:afca19e9607e4e5d43126c1a40eeb533 [weak]
          - Filesize:3395186 [weak]
         Last modification reported: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:57:41 +0000
      E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing?

      I’ve tried:

      apt-get update
      apt-get clean
      apt-get autoclean
      apt-get update && upgrade or apt-get --dist-upgrade

      I guess the hashes don’t match and was wondering if anyone had thoughts on it or solutions?

      Thanks

      #4800
      Anonymous

        Which antiX version (e.g “antiX17 Full 32bit”) are you using?
        Are you are attempting to upgrade a freshly-installed system, or (re “been awhile”) this is an existing system which has been idle across months?

        #4810
        Forum Admin
        rokytnji

          Fresh install on my

          $ inxi -Fxrz
          System:    Host: biker Kernel: 4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 gcc: 6.3.0 Desktop: IceWM 1.4.2
                     Distro: antiX-17_x64-full Heather Heyer 24 October 2017
          Machine:   Device: laptop System: Dell product: Latitude E4310 v: 0001 serial: N/A
                     Mobo: Dell model: 0T6M8G v: A01 serial: N/A BIOS: Dell v: A03 date: 07/08/2010
          Battery    BAT0: charge: 48.8 Wh 127.0% condition: 38.5/48.8 Wh (79%)
                     model: Samsung SDI DELL RM6618A status: Full
          CPU:       Dual core Intel Core i5 M 520 (-MT-MCP-) arch: Nehalem rev.5 cache: 3072 KB
                     flags: (lm nx sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx) bmips: 9581
                     clock speeds: max: 2400 MHz 1: 1599 MHz 2: 1333 MHz 3: 1599 MHz 4: 1733 MHz
          Graphics:  Card: Intel Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller bus-ID: 00:02.0
                     Display Server: X.Org 1.19.2 driver: intel Resolution: 1366x768@60.00hz
                     OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ironlake Mobile version: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6 Direct Render: Yes
          Audio:     Card Intel 5 Series/3400 Series High Definition Audio driver: snd_hda_intel bus-ID: 00:1b.0
                     Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp
          Network:   Card-1: Intel 82577LM Gigabit Network Connection driver: e1000e v: 3.2.6-k port: 6040 bus-ID: 00:19.0
                     IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
                     Card-2: Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6200 driver: iwlwifi bus-ID: 02:00.0
                     IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
          Drives:    HDD Total Size: 60.0GB (39.3% used)
                     ID-1: /dev/sda model: KINGSTON_SV300S3 size: 60.0GB
          Partition: ID-1: / size: 7.7G used: 3.2G (44%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda2
                     ID-2: /home size: 48G used: 19G (43%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
          Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 56.0C mobo: N/A
                     Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
          Repos:     Active apt sources in file: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list
                     deb http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch stretch main nosystemd
                     Active apt sources in file: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
                     deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch-updates main contrib non-free
                     Active apt sources in file: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
                     deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free
                     deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
          Info:      Processes: 198 Uptime: 1:17 Memory: 855.1/7912.1MB Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 6.3.0
                     Client: Shell (bash 4.4.121) inxi: 2.3.53 
          

          Fresh dist-upgrade also done with no errors

          # apt -f install
          Reading package lists... Done
          Building dependency tree       
          Reading state information... Done
          0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
          

          Just installing backup stuff to complete install.

          harry@biker:~
          $ ls
          Backups      cl1        Games       Images    SpaceFM_plugins  Wallpaper
          Bandits      Desktop    icewmc.xpm  Isos      stuff            weather.sh
          batti-0.3.8  Documents  icewm.xpm   Music     uhhuh
          Books        Downloads  icons       Pictures  Videos
          

          So far. About a hour worth of work.

          Screenshot

          Just helping on how to post a question is all. Howdy and Welcome.

          Not sure how yours is screwed up yet. Might wanna look into dpkg -reconfigure maybe.

          http://manpages.debian.org/stretch/debconf/dpkg-reconfigure.8.en.html

          • This reply was modified 6 years, 4 months ago by rokytnji.
          • This reply was modified 6 years, 4 months ago by rokytnji.

          Sometimes I drive a crooked road to get my mind straight.
          I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute off it.
          Motorcycle racing is rocket science.

          Linux Registered User # 475019
          How to Search for AntiX solutions to your problems

          #4814
          Anonymous

            @skidoo, it’s antix-17 64-bit and freshly installed. The been awhile comment as just supposed to mean I haven’t used a debian based OS for 4 or 5 years, so I’ve forgot some of the commands.

            @roky, i’ll try to use the command you used and will report back.

            #4818
            Anonymous

              Removing the previously-downloaded package lists resiging in /var/lib/apt/lists directory should resolve the problem.
              ( Afterward, fresh copies will be downloaded when you next perform sudo apt update )

              As sudo/root, Open a terminal emulator (e.g. urxvt, lxterminal) or file manager, and navigate to /var/lib/apt/lists/
              and delete the contents of that directory. Afterward, again perform sudo apt update (and, if you wish, sudo apt upgrade)

              These linked pages describe the situation and corroborate the solution I’ve “explained” above.
              I’m “explaining” rather than typing out exact command(s) b/c I discourage the practice of copy/pasting from web browser into terminal prompt
              (especially when the command involves a “rm” operation!)
              http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15505775/debian-apt-packages-hash-sum-mismatch
              http://askubuntu.com/questions/41605/trouble-downloading-packages-list-due-to-a-hash-sum-mismatch-error/

              #4842
              Anonymous

                Hi, sorry for the delay.

                @rokytnji, your suggestion did not work and the same stuff popped up as above. Sould I copy pasta the inxi -Fxrzcommand here?

                @skidoo, your suggestion didn’t work either as I got the same error as my initial.

                What I did to get it to upgrade was to temporarily disable the antix repo as it was the one causing the error. I had to disable them via synaptic as it seems /etc/apt/sources.list is no longer where the mirrors/sources are kept. I guess there soomething up with the antix repo

                Anyways thanks for y’alls help. 🙂

                #4845
                Anonymous

                  /etc/apt/sources.list is no longer where

                  Debian began transitioning away from a single “/etc/apt/sources.list” file allaway back in 2012, or earlier.
                  I searched just now, trying to find docs regarding “if directory sources.list.d exists, /etc/apt/sources.list will be ignored?” and didn’t find a clear answer. I did find explanations describing benefits of adopting the multi-list approach, in case you care to skim/read:
                  http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26020917/what-is-the-function-of-etc-apt-sources-list-d
                  http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/407328/what-is-the-benefit-of-etc-apt-sources-list-d-over-etc-apt-sources-list
                  http://askubuntu.com/questions/82825/do-files-at-etc-apt-sources-list-d-need-to-have-an-extension-list

                  #4876
                  Anonymous

                    @skidoo, I found where the source list is. They’re like separate lists inside /etc/apt/sources.list.d/

                    I got it so I can update and upgrade using the antix repo without the hash mismatch by forcing the repo to use ssl. Apparently accessing apt archives over HTTP can potentially lead to bugs. So like for example:
                    `sudo nano /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list`

                    Then change for example:
                    deb http://repo.antixlinux.com/testing/ testing main nosystemd
                    to
                    deb https://repo.antixlinux.com/testing/ testing main nosystemd

                    Here’s a site I found for hash mismatch errors and apt, and solutions:
                    http://blog.packagecloud.io/eng/2016/09/27/fixing-apt-hash-sum-mismatch-consistent-apt-repositories/

                    #4879
                    Anonymous

                      Hmmm… I just wrote out what I did to get the antix repo to upgrade as well and it disappeared from here. A shortened version of what I wrote is you gotta change the antix repo to use ssl regarding the hash mismatch or the options suggested in this page

                      Now it’s fully solved for me. 🙂

                      #4882
                      Anonymous

                        Thanks for reporting the solution.

                        Unsure what triggered the forum’s spamfilter for post #4876, but FYI that’s what happened when it “disappeared”.

                      Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
                      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.