Antix 19.3 Full – crash during boot – SELinux policy33 not such file or director

[Member Wallon]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Dear caprea,

Each time, for my post #54294 and for my post #54297, I booted the PC with kernel 4.19.152. I could not do otherwise.

Best regards,
Wallon

[Member Xecure]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Maybe I got it wrong, but I think caprea means you install al kernels you want to use, and you reinstall nvidia drivers (please wait for caprea to confirm). This should build the drivers for each kernel.

Alternatively, with all kernels installed, you can try to use the dkms tool to recompile the nvidia driver for all kernels. First check to see if the nvidia-kernel-dkms package is installed
apt policy nvidia-kernel-dkms
(you should be able to see something in “Installed:”. If it says “Installed: none”, then there is no dkms package installed for nvidia to recompile)
If there is an installed version, run the dkms autoinstall command
sudo dkms autoinstall
If there is none, maybe you need to install it (better ask for caprea’s input)

antiX Live system enthusiast.
General Live Boot Parameters for antiX.

[Member Wallon]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Everything looks good.

an@MSI:~
$ uname -a
Linux MSI 4.19.152-antix.1-amd64-smp #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Oct 18 12:37:14 EEST 2020 x86_64 GNU/Linux
an@MSI:~
$ apt policy nvidia-kernel-dkms
nvidia-kernel-dkms:
  Installed: 460.39-1~bpo10+1
  Candidate: 460.39-1~bpo10+1
  Version table:
 *** 460.39-1~bpo10+1 100
        100 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-backports/non-free amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     418.181.07-1 500
        500 http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian buster/non-free amd64 Packages
an@MSI:~
$ sudo dkms autoinstall
an@MSI:~
$ 

[Moderator caprea]

Helpful

Up

0

::

I have no clue why it doesn’t work for you. One difference I see is, I reinstalled kernel and headers with synaptic, not package-installer.
Edit: Is it possible the nvidia-driver is installed on the kernel 5.8.16 and that is not your problem at all ?
Please dkms status

• This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by caprea.

[Member Wallon]

Helpful

Up

0

::

an@MSI:~
$ dkms status
broadcom-sta, 6.30.223.271, 4.19.152-antix.1-amd64-smp, x86_64: installed
broadcom-sta, 6.30.223.271, 4.9.235-antix.1-amd64-smp, x86_64: installed
ndiswrapper, 1.61, 4.19.152-antix.1-amd64-smp, x86_64: installed
ndiswrapper, 1.61, 4.9.235-antix.1-amd64-smp, x86_64: installed
nvidia-current, 460.39, 4.19.152-antix.1-amd64-smp, x86_64: installed
virtualbox-guest, 6.1.16, 4.19.152-antix.1-amd64-smp, x86_64: installed (original_module exists)
virtualbox-guest, 6.1.16, 4.9.235-antix.1-amd64-smp, x86_64: installed
an@MSI:~
$ 

[Member roland]

Helpful

Up

0

::

I also have the missing policy.33 report while initialising the boot on my installed 19.3 PC with kernel 5.8.16, but it causes no problems that I am aware of and proceeds to boot and stay booted. I am merely curious as to why this has begun to appear while I have not seen it on previous releases. But this is a new build so it has only ever run 19.3. and I am not in a position to tinker with kernel versions or graphics drivers for other reasons.

It has an Nvidia graphics card properly installed, is this warning indeed related to the presence of this card or is this irrelevant?

I am building another dual-cpu PC and will need to source a graphics card. Can anyone recommend an economical chipset to go for or a specific card that is not Nvidia? I have no quarrel with Nvidia but it seems sensible to ask the advice of others who may have travelled this route and perhaps found something more suitable. My use of graphics is very limited and any old cheapo card will in fact be suitable.

Thanks in advance for all responses.

[Author]

Posts