[SOLVED] antiX-21 update problem

Forum Forums New users New Users and General Questions [SOLVED] antiX-21 update problem

  • This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated Mar 4-10:34 am by andfree.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #78507
    Member
    andfree
      $ sudo apt-get update
      Hit:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports InRelease
      Hit:2 http://security.debian.org bullseye-security InRelease
      Hit:3 http://ftp.cc.uoc.gr/mirrors/linux/mx/antix/bullseye bullseye InRelease
      Hit:4 http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease    
      Get:5 http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease [36.8 kB]
      Reading package lists... Done      
      E: Release file for http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye-updates/InRelease is expired (invalid since 164d 4h 18min 9s). Updates for this repository will not be applied.
      Repos:
        Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list 
        1: deb http://ftp.cc.uoc.gr/mirrors/linux/mx/antix/bullseye bullseye main nosystemd nonfree
        Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bullseye-backports.list 
        1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main contrib non-free
        Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list 
        1: deb http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ bullseye-updates main contrib non-free
        Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 
        1: deb http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ bullseye main contrib non-free
        2: deb http://security.debian.org/ bullseye-security main contrib non-free
        No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list
      System:    Kernel: 4.9.0-279-antix.1-486-smp i686 bits: 32 compiler: gcc v: 10.2.1 Desktop: IceWM 2.8.0 
                 Distro: antiX-21_386-base Grup Yorum 31 October 2021 base: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) 
      Machine:   Type: Laptop System: TOSHIBA product: Satellite 2450 v: PS245E-03TE0-GK serial: <filter> 
                 Mobo: TOSHIBA model: Portable PC v: Version A0 serial: <filter> BIOS: TOSHIBA v: Version 1.30 
                 date: 03/20/2003 
      CPU:       Info: Single Core model: Intel Pentium 4 bits: 32 type: MCP arch: Netburst Northwood rev: 7 
                 cache: L2: 512 KiB 
                 flags: pae sse sse2 bogomips: 5585 
                 Speed: 2793 MHz min/max: N/A Core speed (MHz): 1: 2793 
      Graphics:  Device-1: NVIDIA NV17M [GeForce4 420 Go] vendor: Toshiba driver: nouveau v: kernel 
                 bus-ID: 01:00.0 
                 Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.11 driver: loaded: nouveau unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa 
                 resolution: 1024x768~60Hz 
                 OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI nv17 x86/MMX/SSE2 v: 1.2 Mesa 20.3.5 direct render: Yes 
      Audio:     Device-1: Intel 82801DB/DBL/DBM AC97 Audio vendor: Toshiba driver: snd_intel8x0 v: kernel 
                 bus-ID: 00:1f.5 
                 Sound Server-1: ALSA v: k4.9.0-279-antix.1-486-smp running: yes 
      Network:   Device-1: Realtek RTL-8100/8101L/8139 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter vendor: Toshiba driver: 8139too 
                 v: 0.9.28 port: ce00 bus-ID: 02:09.0 
                 IF: eth0 state: unknown speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter> 
      Drives:    Local Storage: total: 93.16 GiB used: 2.91 GiB (3.1%) 
                 ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Toshiba model: MK1032GAX size: 93.16 GiB 
      Partition: ID-1: / size: 89.65 GiB used: 2.91 GiB (3.2%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1 
      Swap:      ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 1.5 GiB used: 104 KiB (0.0%) dev: /dev/sda2 
      Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 71.0 C mobo: N/A 
                 Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A 
      Info:      Processes: 126 Uptime: 37m Memory: 1000.4 MiB used: 377.4 MiB (37.7%) Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 
                 Compilers: gcc: 10.2.1 Packages: 1213 Shell: Bash v: 5.1.4 inxi: 3.3.06

      Similar problem I had faced in antiX-19:
      https://www.antixforum.com/forums/topic/package-mirrors-list/page/2/#post-43698

      • This topic was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by andfree.
      #78508
      Member
      ile
        Helpful
        Up
        0
        ::

        is the system clock correctly set?

        #78509
        Member
        andfree
          Helpful
          Up
          0
          ::

          is the system clock correctly set?

          Yes, I think it doesn’t have to do with the clock. I suppose the solution must be similar with the one that anticapitalista & caprea had indicated to me in antiX-19 (see the link in my previous post).

          #78518
          Member
          ModdIt
            Helpful
            Up
            0
            ::

            Hi andfree,
            when the system clock is set correctly and you are not using an exit point in another
            country or time zone due to a VPN do please just change the mirror and try again.
            I look here if issues occurr https://antixlinux.com/mirmon/antix-mirror-status.html

            Using a VPN check your IP adress then choosing a mirror matching the exit point and time zone will
            help to avoid problems.

            Users of some networks may have issues due to the provider switching exit nodes during connection to
            a mirror or other sites. No way around that except to try again. Vodafone cable in Germany is a prime
            example.

            Most of the mirrors are run by volunteers, some have temporary or total down times due to pandemic
            or in some cases other reasons.

            #78519
            Moderator
            caprea
              Helpful
              Up
              1
              ::

              On antiX21 you can try to replace the content of /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
              sudo leafpad /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list

              with this

              # Debian Bullseye Updates
               deb http://mirror.eu.oneandone.net/debian/ bullseye-updates main contrib non-free
              #78522
              Member
              ile
                Helpful
                Up
                0
                ::

                http://ftp.gr. bullseye dists files are dated Sept.2021
                whereas http://ftp.us. files are date March.2022

                system can do better with differing repository list?
                as caprea suggest
                credit apt is fairly smart to point this out?

                #78523
                Member
                andfree
                  Helpful
                  Up
                  0
                  ::

                  On antiX21 you can try to replace the content of /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list (…)

                  It worked. Many thanks, caprea.
                  Thanks to all of you for the replies.

                Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.