antiX-23-alpha1-runit-full (64bit) for testing

[Member Robin]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Update:
Strange enough, all the deleted files are actually present in a folder e.g. /media/sda4/.Trash-1001 . Even those which where deleted with »Shift-Del« instead of „Del”. And also the files which failed to get saved to the trash folder in user’s home due to the symbolic link issue I described above are actually saved there. And along with the files there exists a second folder named „info”, full of textfiles of same name as the deleted ones with the extension .trashinfo, containing something like

[Trash Info]
Path=Arbeitsordner/Test/Testordner/testdatei6
DeletionDate=2023-02-11T10:22:02

But none of those trashed files show up in the new trashbin in zzzFM. Another bug?

Windows is like a submarine. Open a window and serious problems will start.

[Member blur13]

Helpful

Up

0

::

@fladd

I agree with this, that the fonts should be matching. For a novice its not obvious why some programs use one font and other programs another font. Matching fonts makes more sense. Also, the /etc/environment file should be edited so that qt themes actually apply (I think it was missing a line break in both antiX 19 and 21).

@Robin
You are doing a great job thoroughly testing the trash-can feature, seems its not “release ready” yet.

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

You are doing a great job thoroughly testing the trash-can feature, seems its not “release ready” yet.

Obviously, since it is an alpha release, it won’t be ‘release ready’ for several months yet.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Member blur13]

Helpful

Up

0

::

@anticapitalista

Yes of course, you are right. The whole point is to try things out.

[Member sasa_]

Helpful

Up

0

::

My old hardware

$ inxi -b
System:
  Host: antix1 Kernel: 4.9.0-326-antix.1-amd64-smp arch: x86_64 bits: 64
    Desktop: IceWM v: 3.3.1
    Distro: antiX-22_x64-base Grup Yorum 19 October 2022
Machine:
  Type: Desktop System: wortmann product: P5K v: N/A
    serial: <superuser required>
  Mobo: ASUSTeK model: P5K v: Rev 1.xx serial: <superuser required>
    BIOS: American Megatrends v: 1201 date: 10/14/2008
CPU:
  Info: dual core Intel Core2 Duo E8500 [MCP] speed (MHz): avg: 1998
    min/max: 1998/3163
Graphics:
  Device-1: NVIDIA GT218 [GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3] driver: nouveau v: kernel
  Display: server: X.Org v: 1.20.11 driver: X: loaded: modesetting
    unloaded: fbdev,vesa gpu: nouveau resolution: 1366x768~60Hz
  OpenGL: renderer: NVA8 v: 3.3 Mesa 20.3.5
Network:
  Device-1: Qualcomm Atheros Attansic L1 Gigabit Ethernet driver: atl1
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 79.33 GiB used: 4.66 GiB (5.9%)
Info:
  Processes: 159 Uptime: 8m Memory: 3.86 GiB used: 883.9 MiB (22.4%)
  Shell: Bash inxi: 3.3.19

Archbang with kernel 6.1.9, works on my old pc. There is hope that antiX will also work, with kernel 6.

Attachments:

1. 

   viber_image_2023-02-12_02-52-07-848.jpg
   

2. 

   viber_image_2023-02-12_02-52-10-021.jpg
   

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

@sasa_ – there is a 6.1.10 kernel available if you want to try it.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Member sasa_]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Antix 23, with kernel 5.10, I can’t even start, I get a green screen. When Kernel 6 arrives, then I’ll see if it works.

[Member Xunzi_23]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Hallo anticapitalista, maybe going blind 😉 where can I find the series 6.1.10 kernel.

I can try and install it on thinkpad then remaster.

Not a help, on my system siduction boots and runs without issue as does sparky. Siduction 6 series kernel
Sparky with 5.10.

Kernel 5.10 on antiX 22 and 23 Green screen crash, on older kernel antiX 23 same, tried some boot cheat code
I found in the net system gets further but still no successful boot.

I have also been unable to install a debian kernel running live on a thinkpad always due rtl8821ce module install
fail. Need some hand holding there I guess.

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

It should have appeared in the antiX testing/sid repos

Here is a direct link: http://repo.antixlinux.com/testing/pool/main/l/linux-upstream/

Before you install, remove rtl8821ce-dkms and exfat-dkms.

Good luck 🙂

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Member sasa_]

Helpful

Up

1

::

antiX 22, working kernel 6.1.11.

$ uname -a
Linux antix1 6.1.11-antix.1-amd64-smp #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Feb  9 18:34:12 EET 2023 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[Member Xunzi_23]

Helpful

Up

1

::

At last boot and running on the Nvidia and I52500K device,

Kernel updated smoothly 6.1.10 after the removal of rtl8821ce-dkms
exfat module was not installed.

Hopefully this will also run better on my friends Ryzen 8 core monster,
we noticed some odd slowdowns wth the older 5x kernel. Known problem.

@ anticapitalista. Many thanks for the direct link to kernel,
maybe repos here were just slow to synch.

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Thanks @sasa_ and @Xunzi_23

Glad to hear that the 6.1 antiX kernel works for you both.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Re 6.1 kernel – good news is that it seems to work ‘better’ for some hardware where 5.10 was problematic.
Playing video seemed to be very smooth.
The ‘bad’ news is that it is significantly more RAM (but not CPU) intensive.

I compared 5.10 kernel and 6.1.11 kernel on antiX22 (bullseye) and found the 6.1 kernel to leak memory.
Initial boot RAM is slightly higher than the 5.10 ie about 4 MB higher.
BUT after a few minutes of use, it jumps to being 30 MB higher.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Member Robin]

Helpful

Up

0

::

sasa_ wrote:

antiX 22, working kernel 6.1.11.

anticapitalista wrote:

I compared 5.10 kernel and 6.1.11 kernel on antiX22 (bullseye)

Sorry for my ignorance, but where is the 6.1.11 kernel located? Can’t find it neither in the apt listings of antiX 23 nor following your above direct link. Only 6.1.10 kernel seems to be available for me. What am I missing here?

$ apt-cache search linux-image | grep antix | grep amd64
linux-image-4.19.0-222-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.19.0-222-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.19.0-256-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.19.0-256-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.19.184-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.19.184-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.19.198-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.19.198-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.19.202-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.19.202-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.4.0-264-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.4.0-264-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.4.0-276-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.4.0-276-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.4.0-279-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.4.0-279-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.4.0-296-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.4.0-296-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.9.0-264-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.9.0-264-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.9.0-276-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.9.0-276-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.9.0-279-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.9.0-279-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.9.0-294-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.9.0-294-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-4.9.0-326-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 4.9.0-326-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-5.10.104-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 5.10.104-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-5.10.137-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 5.10.137-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-5.10.142-antix.2-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 5.10.142-antix.2-amd64-smp
linux-image-5.10.27-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 5.10.27-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-5.10.52-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 5.10.52-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-5.10.57-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 5.10.57-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-5.10.88-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 5.10.88-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-5.8.16-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 5.8.16-antix.1-amd64-smp
linux-image-6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp - Linux kernel, version 6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp

Index of /testing/pool/main/l/linux-upstream
[PARENTDIR]	Parent Directory	 	- 	 
[ ]	linux-headers-6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp-1_amd64.deb	2023-02-07 18:14 	8.4M	 
[ ]	linux-image-6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp-1_amd64.deb	2023-02-07 18:14 	51M	 
[ ]	linux-upstream_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp-1.diff.gz	2023-02-07 17:59 	63K	 
[ ]	linux-upstream_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp-1.dsc	2023-02-07 17:59 	1.2K	 
[ ]	linux-upstream_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp.orig.tar.gz	2023-02-07 17:59 	216M	 

Index of /sid/pool/main/l/linux-upstream
[PARENTDIR]	Parent Directory	 	- 	 
[ ]	linux-headers-6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp-1_amd64.deb	2023-02-07 18:14 	8.4M	 
[ ]	linux-image-6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp-1_amd64.deb	2023-02-07 18:15 	51M	 
[ ]	linux-upstream_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp-1.diff.gz	2023-02-07 17:59 	63K	 
[ ]	linux-upstream_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp-1.dsc	2023-02-07 17:59 	1.2K	 
[ ]	linux-upstream_6.1.10-antix.1-amd64-smp.orig.tar.gz	2023-02-07 17:59 	216M	 

Btw, many thanks for the hint about uninstalling the rtl8821ce-dkms module package. This finally fixed the issue I had with apt constantly retrying to build the kernel anew when any other package was to be installed, so now apt is normally usable again.

Windows is like a submarine. Open a window and serious problems will start.

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

@Robin – sorry for the confusion.

6.1.10 is available in testing/sid (ie antiX-23) repos
6.1.11 is available in antiX bullseye (antiX-22) repos.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Author]

Posts