Forum › Forums › New users › New Users and General Questions › antix 32 or 64 bit?
- This topic has 10 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated Nov 21-7:53 pm by christophe.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 30, 2019 at 2:46 pm #28755Member
dimz
I try both in my system …
with antix 32 start from 85 M RAM
with antix 64 start from 500 M RAM
my system is 64
i prefer use antix 32 because is faster but is this better solution or must use antix 64 ?
give me your opiniondim@antix1dim:~
$ inxi -zv7
System:
Host: antix1dim Kernel: 4.9.160-antix.2-486-smp i686 bits: 32 compiler: gcc v: 6.3.0
Desktop: IceWM 1.4.2 info: icewmtray dm: SLiM 1.3.4
Distro: antiX-17.4.1_386-full Helen Keller 28 March 2019
base: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch)
Machine:
Type: Laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: HP Compaq 6730b (GW687AV) v: F.08
serial: <filter> Chassis: type: 10 serial: <filter>
Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 30DD v: KBC Version 96.18 serial: <filter>
BIOS: Hewlett-Packard v: 68PDD Ver. F.08 date: 09/18/2008
Battery:
ID-1: BAT0 charge: 45.7 Wh condition: 46.5/46.5 Wh (100%) volts: 12.5/11.1
model: Hewlett-Packard Primary type: Li-ion serial: <filter> status: Unknown
Memory:
RAM: total: 1.90 GiB used: 677.8 MiB (34.8%)
RAM Report: permissions: Unable to run dmidecode. Root privileges required.
CPU:
Topology: Dual Core model: Intel Core2 Duo P8400 bits: 64 type: MCP arch: Penryn
rev: 6 L2 cache: 3072 KiB bogomips: 9044
Speed: 1600 MHz min/max: 800/2267 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 1600 2: 1600
Flags: acpi aperfmperf apic arch_perfmon bts clflush cmov constant_tsc cx16 cx8 de
ds_cpl dtes64 dtherm dts est flexpriority fpu fxsr ht lahf_lm lm mca mce mmx monitor
msr mtrr nx pae pat pbe pdcm pebs pge pni pse pse36 sep smx ss sse sse2 sse4_1 ssse3
tm tm2 tpr_shadow tsc vme vmx vnmi xtpr
Graphics:
Device-1: Intel Mobile 4 Series Integrated Graphics vendor: Hewlett-Packard
driver: i915 v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0 chip ID: 8086:2a42
Display: server: X.Org 1.19.2 driver: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa
resolution: 1280×800~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Mobile Intel GM45 Express x86/MMX/SSE2 v: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6
direct render: Yes
Audio:
Device-1: Intel 82801I HD Audio vendor: Hewlett-Packard driver: snd_hda_intel
v: kernel bus ID: 00:1b.0 chip ID: 8086:293e
Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.9.160-antix.2-486-smp
Network:
Device-1: Broadcom Limited BCM4312 802.11b/g LP-PHY vendor: Hewlett-Packard
driver: wl v: kernel port: 6000 bus ID: 02:00.0 chip ID: 14e4:4315
IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
IP v4: <filter> scope: global broadcast: <filter>
IP v6: <filter> scope: link
Device-2: Broadcom Limited NetLink BCM5787M Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express
vendor: Hewlett-Packard driver: tg3 v: 3.137 port: 6000 bus ID: 85:00.0
chip ID: 14e4:1693
IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
WAN IP: <filter>
Drives:
Local Storage: total: 126.33 GiB used: 6.23 GiB (4.9%)
ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Toshiba model: MK1252GSX size: 111.79 GiB speed: 3.0 Gb/s
serial: <filter> rev: 1C scheme: MBR
ID-2: /dev/sdb type: USB vendor: Toshiba model: TransMemory size: 14.53 GiB
serial: <filter> rev: PMAP scheme: MBR
Optical-1: /dev/sr0 vendor: Optiarc model: DVD-ROM DDU820S rev: MH04
dev-links: cdrom,dvd
Features: speed: 24 multisession: yes audio: yes dvd: yes rw: none state: running
RAID:
Message: No RAID data was found.
Partition:
ID-1: / size: 17.40 GiB used: 3.64 GiB (20.9%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda3
label: rootantiX17.4.1 uuid: 3820c3bb-0b7f-447b-9b6f-547a4c7e1a7d
ID-2: /home size: 20.84 GiB used: 2.54 GiB (12.2%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda4
label: homeantiX uuid: f01c1ec2-fb66-49b9-b5c5-e5fddc12f018
ID-3: /media/-rw size: 11.66 GiB used: 40.0 MiB (0.3%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sdb5
label: -rw uuid: 3cd1ace9-6a9d-43a0-933e-a1a45fd7793d
ID-4: /media/MX-Live raw size: 1.41 GiB size: <root required> used: <root required>
fs: iso9660 dev: /dev/sdb4 label: MX-Live uuid: 2019-10-21-17-35-05-00
ID-5: /media/usbboot size: 240.2 MiB used: 7.0 MiB (2.9%) fs: vfat dev: /dev/sdb3
label: usbboot uuid: 3055-742E
ID-6: /media/usbdata size: 1.03 GiB used: 5.8 MiB (0.6%) fs: ntfs dev: /dev/sdb1
label: usbdata uuid: 0504B837002B90F5
ID-7: swap-1 size: 6.52 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda5 label: N/A
uuid: 40ccc468-e3a5-4544-82b8-ee84ab6df0b5
Unmounted:
ID-1: /dev/sda1 size: 1 KiB fs: <root required> label: N/A uuid: N/A
ID-2: /dev/sda2 size: 46.57 GiB fs: ext4 label: N/A
uuid: 743f0e89-2ac8-42cb-a66d-bbef565e1ecc
ID-3: /dev/sda6 size: 18.62 GiB fs: ext4 label: N/A
uuid: d478de32-5949-4f6f-b9d3-aabeaaf9bcc9
ID-4: /dev/sdb2 size: 1 KiB fs: <root required> label: N/A uuid: N/A
USB:
Hub: 1-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 6 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s
chip ID: 1d6b:0002
Hub: 2-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 6 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s
chip ID: 1d6b:0002
Device-1: 2-5:2 info: Toshiba Kingston DataTraveler 102/2.0 / HEMA Flash Drive 2 GB
/ PNY Attache 4GB Stick
type: Mass Storage driver: usb-storage interfaces: 1 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s
chip ID: 0930:6545 serial: <filter>
Hub: 3-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 2 rev: 1.1 speed: 12 Mb/s
chip ID: 1d6b:0001
Device-2: 3-1:2 info: HP Bluetooth 2.0 Interface [Broadcom BCM2045] type: Bluetooth
driver: btusb interfaces: 4 rev: 2.0 speed: 12 Mb/s chip ID: 03f0:171d
Hub: 4-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 2 rev: 1.1 speed: 12 Mb/s
chip ID: 1d6b:0001
Hub: 5-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 2 rev: 1.1 speed: 12 Mb/s
chip ID: 1d6b:0001
Hub: 6-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 2 rev: 1.1 speed: 12 Mb/s
chip ID: 1d6b:0001
Hub: 7-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 2 rev: 1.1 speed: 12 Mb/s
chip ID: 1d6b:0001
Hub: 8-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 2 rev: 1.1 speed: 12 Mb/s
chip ID: 1d6b:0001
Sensors:
System Temperatures: cpu: 50.0 C mobo: 43.0 C
Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A
Info:
Processes: 161 Uptime: 1h 08m Init: SysVinit v: 2.88 runlevel: 5 default: 5
Compilers: gcc: 6.3.0 alt: 6 Shell: bash v: 4.4.12 running in: lxterminal
inxi: 3.0.36
dim@antix1dim:~
$October 30, 2019 at 5:54 pm #28766ModeratorBobC
October 30, 2019 at 6:33 pm #28768Forum Admin
rokytnji
::Agree with BobC.
Memory: RAM: total: 1.90 GiB used: 677.8 MiB (34.8%)Sometimes I drive a crooked road to get my mind straight.
Not all who Wander are Lost.
I'm not outa place. I'm from outer space.Linux Registered User # 475019
How to Search for AntiX solutions to your problemsOctober 30, 2019 at 6:53 pm #28769Member
oops
::If you have 4 gb of memory or less, 64 bit is unnecessary, so use 32 bit
… And if superior to 4 gb of memory, you can use a PAE Kernel with the 32 bits version.
October 31, 2019 at 9:27 am #28792Memberdimz
October 31, 2019 at 9:37 pm #28800Member
rayluo
::If you have 4 gb of memory or less, 64 bit is unnecessary, so use 32 bit
… And if superior to 4 gb of memory, you can use a PAE Kernel with the 32 bits version.
But AntiX 19 does not (yet?) provide some 32bit PAE flavor to download, does it? Not from SourceForge Mirror.
November 1, 2019 at 4:24 am #28806Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::No, but it does provide plenty of pae kernels in the repos – easy to install using cli-aptiX
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
November 2, 2019 at 11:25 am #28843Member
rayluo
::AntiX 19 does not (yet?) provide some 32bit PAE flavor to download, does it?
No, but it does provide plenty of pae kernels in the repos – easy to install using cli-aptiX
I happen to be a LiveUSB user, exclusively. Following the hint above, I ran cli-aptiX to choose a PAE kernel. The update itself seemed smooth, but after the update, “uname -a” showed no difference. Perhaps it would (understandably) need a reboot to take effect, but does that mean I need a root persistence and later preferably a remaster? (My first root persistence attempt failed probably due to running out of thumb drive space, so I would need to try it again later.)
Also I notice there is a Live USB Kernel Updater inside the antiX menu. Is it used to somehow replace the root persistence and remaster step? But does that mean I would need to first install the new kernel to hard disk, for it to be available for “flushing” into the Live USB disk?
I don’t mind to do some trial and error here. But it would also be nice if there is already some (even high level) guidance for this.
November 2, 2019 at 11:57 am #28845Anonymous
::The live-kernel-updater utility requires (demands) that you first perform a live-remaster operation & reboot. This prerequisite ensures that a known-good falback will be available if a newly-installed kernel misbehaves on your system.
guidance:
0) refer to “Synposis” section of https://github.com/BitJam/live-kernel-updater/blob/master/README.md
1) “install” a different kernel via synaptic
2) perform a live-remaster operation
3) reboot & then run live-kernel-updater4) After installing a new kernel and testing across XX reboot sessions to become confident that everything’s working fine, browse the liveboot media AsRoot and manually remove the fallback *.old files (a housekeeping step to reduce the amount of used space on the drive)
November 2, 2019 at 12:18 pm #28846Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::AS skidoo says except you can run live-kernel-updater immediately after the remaster has finished and before reboot.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
November 21, 2019 at 7:53 pm #29595Moderator
christophe
::The only bad thing about 32-bit, in 4 GB or less computers, IMO, is that some software is only available in 64-bit.
confirmed antiX frugaler, since 2019
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.