antiX base on old desktop computer

Forum Forums New users New Users and General Questions antiX base on old desktop computer

  • This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated Apr 21-5:35 pm by BobC.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #35147
    Member
    guy13

      Hi all,

      I’ve been using different flavours of Linux for almost twenty years now but it’s been a while since I had to try something totally new.

      I’m trying to install a lightweight distro on my sister’s old desktop. It has a Celeron 3.06Ghz processor, a 80GB HD but only 432 MiB RAM.

      With these specs I thought antiX-09.2.1_386-base was my best option but it is mind bogglingly slow even before firefox is launched and she would also like me to install Thunderbird… As I read somewhere that antiX is among the best and fastest for old machines I’m thinking something’s not going the way it should: e.g. it literally takes minutes to move a window a few centimetres (it seems to move pixel line by pixel line and often copies of fragments of windows remain in the original position or spread out across the screen).

      Is there anything anyone can recommend I can try to speed things up ? Could downgrading file systems from ext4 to ext3 help ? I will have to reinstall anyway since I forgot that the HD was divided into two partitions of about 40GB and that’s not good with antiX base needing much less than that and the home folder that has to go on the other partition needing more soon…

      Anyway, stay safe and thanks in advance.

      #35148
      Forum Admin
      anticapitalista
        Helpful
        Up
        0
        ::

        Knowing more about the hardware would help.

        In a teminal inxi -Fxz

        Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

        antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

        #35150
        Member
        guy13
          Helpful
          Up
          0
          ::

          (Seems like it’s a 64 bits cpu anyway… But isn’t 432 MiB RAM way too small for a 64 bit distro?)

          /home/rita# inxi -Fxz
          System:
            Host: rita1 Kernel: 4.9.212-antix.1-486-smp i686 bits: 32 compiler: gcc
            v: 8.3.0 Desktop: JWM 2.3.7
            Distro: antiX-19.2.1_386-base Hannie Schaft 29 March 2020
            base: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
          Machine:
            Type: Desktop Mobo: N/A model: P4M800-8237 serial: N/A BIOS: Award v: F7
            date: 02/15/2006
          CPU:
            Topology: Single Core model: Intel Celeron bits: 64 type: MCP
            arch: Netburst Smithfield rev: 9 L2 cache: 256 KiB
            flags: lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 bogomips: 6151
            Speed: 3076 MHz min/max: N/A Core speed (MHz): 1: 3076
          Graphics:
            Device-1: VIA CN700/P4M800 Pro/P4M800 CE/VN800 Graphics [S3 UniChrome Pro]
            vendor: Gigabyte driver: N/A bus ID: 01:00.0
            Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.4 driver: vesa resolution: 1280x1024~N/A
            OpenGL: renderer: llvmpipe (LLVM 7.0 128 bits) v: 3.3 Mesa 18.3.6
            direct render: Yes
          Audio:
            Device-1: VIA VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio vendor: Gigabyte GA-7VAX
            driver: snd_via82xx v: kernel bus ID: 00:11.5
            Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.9.212-antix.1-486-smp
          Network:
            Device-1: Realtek RTL-8100/8101L/8139 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter
            vendor: Gigabyte GA-7VM400M/7VT600 driver: 8139too v: 0.9.28 port: c000
            bus ID: 00:13.0
            IF: eth0 state: unknown speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter>
          Drives:
            Local Storage: total: 74.53 GiB used: 6.23 GiB (8.4%)
            ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Western Digital model: WD800BB-22JHC0
            size: 74.53 GiB
          Partition:
            ID-1: / size: 38.29 GiB used: 2.65 GiB (6.9%) fs: ext3 dev: /dev/sda6
            ID-2: /home size: 33.63 GiB used: 3.50 GiB (10.4%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda2
            ID-3: swap-1 size: 976.0 MiB used: 81.3 MiB (8.3%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda5
          Sensors:
            Message: No sensors data was found. Is sensors configured?
          Info:
            Processes: 135 Uptime: 9h 14m Memory: 430.9 MiB used: 294.1 MiB (68.2%)
            Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 Compilers: gcc: 8.3.0 Shell: bash v: 5.0.3
            inxi: 3.0.36
          #35155
          Member
          ModdIt
            Helpful
            Up
            0
            ::

            Hi, You are very low on memory and swapping to Harddisk is very slow.
            Searching the Mother Board P4M800-8237 took me here. https://www.viatech.com/en/silicon/legacy/chipsets/p4m800/
            Check on the board itself but the given board number indicates you can install up to 3GB DDR400/333/266 SDRAM.
            If the information is correct slot in 2 GB and if possible an SSD to get it running and acceptable for general usage. You could keep the harddisk for storage but run from the faster device. Replace the BIOS Battery unless you have already done so, Likely a cr2032 which is cheap and easy to find.
            Memory and SSD can be pretty cheap. I use Patriot burst ssd which is cheap and fast.

            Pale Moon and claws Mail are my choices on older Hardware. Claws is a fantastic mail client.

            #35165
            Moderator
            BobC
              Helpful
              Up
              0
              ::

              I agree with Moddit.

              Upgrade the memory as much as you can, and put in a fast SSD if possible. Both should be cheap if purchased used.

              Firefox is slow and if you need to, you run it, if not, Palemoon is a good alternative.

            Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.