antiX-bullseye-a1-x64-bullseye-full available

Forum Forums antiX-development Development antiX-bullseye-a1-x64-bullseye-full available

  • This topic has 211 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated May 8-8:48 pm by einpoklum.
Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 212 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #54134
    Member
    ex_Koo
      Helpful
      Up
      0
      ::

      Fixed by adding

      DESKTOP_SESSION_CODE=${DESKTOP_SESSION_CODE:-$(head -1 $HOME/.desktop-session/desktop-code.$disp)}
      DESKTOP_SESSION_IM=${DESKTOP_SESSION_IM:-${DESKTOP_SESSION_CODE%-*}}

      and changing the case statement variable to
      case $DESKTOP_SESSION_IM in

      Changes in gitlab, should make it to the repo some time.
      This was caused by separating desktop-session, desktop-menu, and desktop-defaults to their own packages and making them less dependent on each other.

      Is this related to repo testing not working ? The repository ‘https://mirrors.evowise.com/mxlinux-packages/antix/ testing Release’ does not have a Release file.

      #54145
      Forum Admin
      anticapitalista
        Helpful
        Up
        0
        ::

        Confirmed bug of repo-manager (now launched from Control Centre > Software)
        After selecting antix mirror, there are two “//” between antix” and “testing”.
        I am trying to find the reason in the code (starting line 336 in mainwindow.cpp), but I am not proficient enough in C++ to find the reason.

        Talking about the repo, should we change it to bullseye repo or keep on the testing repo?

        repo-manager is not working correctly in a1 (not a surprise, it is an alpha).

        We cannot change antiX repos to bullseye since none of the mirrors have the bullseye repo yet (and won’t have until after the final Debian freeze).

        Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

        antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

        #54158
        Member
        Xecure
          Helpful
          Up
          0
          ::

          We cannot change antiX repos to bullseye since none of the mirrors have the bullseye repo yet (and won’t have until after the final Debian freeze).

          Thanks for letting us know. I was exploring repo.antixlinux.com and saw the bullseye folder, so I made assumptions before checking the other mirrors.

          repo-manager is not working correctly in a1 (not a surprise, it is an alpha).

          I have proposed a fix in the gitlab project, tested it and I think it works.

          Is this related to repo testing not working ? The repository ‘https://mirrors.evowise.com/mxlinux-packages/antix/ testing Release’ does not have a Release file.

          No, but the further discussion does.

          For your case, edit /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list file manually so that you remove the double “//” for a single “/”, so it looks like this:
          https://mirrors.evowise.com/mxlinux-packages/antix/testing testing nosystemd main nonfree

          • This reply was modified 2 years, 3 months ago by Xecure. Reason: fix mirror quote

          antiX Live system enthusiast.
          General Live Boot Parameters for antiX.

          #54160
          Member
          ex_Koo
            Helpful
            Up
            0
            ::

            No, but the further discussion does.

            For your case, edit /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list file manually so that you remove the double “//” for a single “/”, so it looks like this:
            https://mirrors.evowise.com/mxlinux-packages/antix/testing testing nosystemd main nonfree

            Try that a few times already and again this morning still not working even after using repo manager.

            I’m about to stop testing alpha anyway as the motherboard is going back for warranty. Desktop

            Still have it on my T430 but not really the same.

            And yes it does work with this round of new hardware, if you prepared to put some work into it. But new models are just around the corner.

            #54162
            Member
            ex_Koo
              Helpful
              Up
              0
              ::

              Maybe keep an eye on this site from MX, for free and non firmware for antiX-21. Talk to Stevo he has done a lot of work here.
              http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/pool/ahs-staging/f/firmware-nonfree/

              By the way MX-ahs works just fine with the above machine even the old updated version I had install. But still needed to install Asus-wmi ITE IT8665E modules for sensors.

              #54249
              Member
              Xecure
                Helpful
                Up
                0
                ::

                Now geany’s icons look the same as before (Thanks, anticapitalista)

                Internationalisation – menus, antiX apps

                I have been booting the latest snapshot (now there is no ISTRO Name error, thanks) in different languages (UEFI Boot), and menus and most antiX programs seem to be good.
                I have observed a strange phenomenon during the UEFI text menus. If I don’t select the text menus and use the lang=<language-code> boot parameter, the splasht animated bootscreen displays all boot messages in the language I have chosen, but when I pick the language with the text menus, at first it does display translated boot messages, but after the “pick desktop, keep changes” text menu options, it displays the original English boot messages in the tsplash animated screen.

                Anyway, this is just during text menu (UEFI boot mode), but it doesn’t change that the system correctly boots using the selected language, user folders are translated, menus are translated, programs are translated, etc.

                NOTE: I think others should also test this, so we can isolate the issue from my snapshot. Does the “Refresh menus” work for you? I booted in two different languages and “Refresh Menu” didn’t work for updating the “Applications” submenu to display translated categories. I had to use a sudo desktop-menu –write-out-global to get it to display in another language.

                antiX Live system enthusiast.
                General Live Boot Parameters for antiX.

                #54293
                Member
                ile
                  Helpful
                  Up
                  0
                  ::

                  hello anticapitalista

                  Not happening with jwm. Not happening with icewm.

                  There is a behavior between mtpaint and fluxbox.
                  Happens on
                  mtpaint 3.50-0antix1, fluxbox 1.3.7-1~antix1, antiX sid
                  mtpaint 3.50-0antix1, fluxbox 1.3.7-1~antix1, antiX buster
                  mtpaint 3.50-0antix1, fluxbox 1.3.5-2+b2, antiX bullseye
                  When
                  any one of these three windows is on a different workspace than the mtpaint main window,
                  the “Palette Editor” window,
                  the Filemenu “Actions” window,
                  the Filemenu Actionsmenu “Configure File Actions” window

                  if the window is closed when on a separate workspace
                  the result is immediate logout to display manager. Session Lost.
                  Even the “<” on the Actions window does this logout.

                  #54299
                  Anonymous
                    Helpful
                    Up
                    0
                    ::

                    > if the window is closed when on a separate workspace
                    > the result is immediate logout to display manager.

                    FWIW, I could find no matching bug reports
                    https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mtpaint;dist=unstable
                    https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/auto-wjaguar
                    https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mtpaint/+bugs
                    https://github.com/wjaguar/mtPaint/issues

                    #54365
                    Anonymous
                      Helpful
                      Up
                      0
                      ::

                      suggestion: consider culling a few of the fluxbox styles which were present in antiX19
                      build-iso ~~ delete-files.list
                      usr/share/fluxbox/styles/Blackwhite
                      usr/share/fluxbox/styles/Blackwhite-Medium
                      usr/share/fluxbox/styles/BlueFlux
                      usr/share/fluxbox/styles/BlueFlux-Medium

                      On antiX17, the fluxbox style Blackwhite renders fine but on antiX19 it wound up having gray-on-white poor contrast (might be the result of the active/default desktop font)

                      The BlueFlux style, to my eyes is very difficult to read due to insufficient foreground/background contrast.

                      #54367
                      Member
                      ex_Koo
                        Helpful
                        Up
                        0
                        ::

                        I have sound with waterfox now installed waterfox-current-kpe. And also test repo been working just fine again. Thanks

                        #54395
                        Moderator
                        BobC
                          Helpful
                          Up
                          0
                          ::

                          Would it be possible to make ~/bin one of the default directories that gets created and include it in the default path?

                          #54396
                          Moderator
                          christophe
                            Helpful
                            Up
                            0
                            ::

                            I see in .profile that ~/bin and ~/.local/bin gets accommodated into the path, if they exist. Looks like this is already set, but leaves it up to local policy as to which/any/both/none is included?

                            • This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by christophe.

                            confirmed antiX frugaler, since 2019

                            #54402
                            Anonymous
                              Helpful
                              Up
                              0
                              ::

                              ouch, that’s really non-secure!
                              Yes, the mechanism is, already, in place
                              and the instruction within .profile PREPENDS, gives precedence to, ~/.local/bin

                              to see the result:
                              mkdir ~/.local/bin
                              then launch a terminal emulator and type
                              bash -l && echo $PATH

                              Toward understanding the significance of this, consider:

                              BadMe coerces you to run my program. My program has lines buried within it which will:
                              mkdir ~/.local/leafpad (in case it does not already exist)
                              touch ~/.local/bin/leafpad && chmod +x ~/.local/bin/leafpad
                              echo -e “cd / && rm -rf” > ~/.local/bin/leafpad

                              Upon your next attempted launch of leafpad, wave byebye (and you’ll never know what hit ya.)

                              #54403
                              Anonymous
                                Helpful
                                Up
                                0
                                ::

                                safer
                                within ~/.profile

                                # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists
                                if [ -d "$HOME/bin" ] ; then
                                    PATH="$PATH:$HOME/bin"
                                fi
                                #54409
                                Member
                                userzero
                                  Helpful
                                  Up
                                  0
                                  ::

                                  Slim doesn’t read ~/.profile,

                                  # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists
                                  if [ -d "$HOME/bin" ] ; then
                                      PATH="$HOME/bin:$PATH"
                                  fi
                                  
                                  # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists
                                  if [ -d "$HOME/.local/bin" ] ; then
                                      PATH="$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH"
                                  fi
                                  >_ echo $PATH
                                  /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/sbin:/usr/sbin

                                  “[…]but leaves it up to local policy as to which/any/both/none is included?[…]”

                                  Help, how to set PATH?

                                  • This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by userzero.
                                Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 212 total)
                                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.