Forum › Forums › New users › New Users and General Questions › antiX will not install on my old computer
- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated Mar 3-4:01 pm by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 3, 2020 at 7:25 am #33272Member
BitSeeker
To be fair, its a very old computer, probably from circa 2003, HP Compaq d530, Pentium 4 with 2Gb RAM. I tried antiX because it is “lightweight” but I can’t even boot the Live DVD. I have downloaded the “full” image. The boot process proceeds to the early stages but seems to fail at the display driver. I have attached images of what I am seeing on the screen. The internal DVD drive doesn’t work, so I’ve had to use an external one, but I have tried burning a second copy of the DVD as well as a different drive. The DVD boots fine on my main PC.
It this old PC under-specified for antiX?
March 3, 2020 at 8:15 am #33275Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::Try – At the boot menu, type
load=all bdev=sr1
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
March 3, 2020 at 11:21 am #33278MemberBitSeeker
::Thanks, that did seem to work and it now boots into the desktop.
I found some of the Menu hierarchy a bit puzzling, e.g. LibreOffice under “Multimedia” and components spread across to sub-menus? Internet tools under Internet | Internet? Why the extra level? Graphics and LibreOffice components under Games?
Performance seems to be reasonable considering the age of the PC at least I now know that I can run a Linux distro on it.
Thanks.
March 3, 2020 at 11:42 am #33280Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::There is definitely something wrong if you have that sort of menu hierarchy.
Did you check the md5sum of the downloaded and booted iso?Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
March 3, 2020 at 12:53 pm #33281MemberBitSeeker
::Yes, I did check the MD5 sum using md5sum and it matched. I got the same menu hierarchy on both of the DVD’s that I burned and on both computers that I booted them on.
Filename: antiX-19.1_386-full.iso Expected MD5: 0328cbcb092a5213a9ee4cc6c7906caf antiX-19.1_386-full.iso Actual MD5: 0328cbcb092a5213a9ee4cc6c7906caf antiX-19.1_386-full.isoOther than requiring a 32-bit version, I wasn’t actually sure which image to download, but the most recent “full” image seemed a reasonable place to start from. It was downloaded from the “United Kingdom – Centre for Scientific Computing, University of Warwick – Coventry” mirror.
I didn’t have that kind of issue with MX, but for the old PC I thought antiX might be a better choice as it is a “light” as opposed to “medium” weight distro.
- This reply was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by BitSeeker.
- This reply was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by BitSeeker.
March 3, 2020 at 1:25 pm #33284Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::If you look at this official video, you will see what the menu should look like.
- This reply was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by anticapitalista.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
March 3, 2020 at 4:01 pm #33287Anonymous
::hi bitseeker,
glad to see you got to the desktop. On the live I’ve seen menu corruption a few
times as well . hit therefresh menu or update menuoption and the menu gets put right. this goes away once installed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

