architecture i386 buggy in 64 Antix

Forum Forums General Software architecture i386 buggy in 64 Antix

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated Sep 21-6:14 pm by Xecure.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #67638
    Member
    gusi

    hi

    i can add a architecture with
    sudo dpkg –add-architecture i386
    —> display no error
    sudo apt-get update
    BUT
    sudo dpkg –print-architecture
    —> display : amd64

    also as test with wine:
    normal in Debian, wine64 and wine32 would be installed

    Gui Synaptic show me , that the Architecure i386 is installed
    but no wine32 on Wine-install

    The archtecture-Entry does not work in anitx 64
    is here a Trick , i can resolove this ?

    Sry for my bad english

    #67641
    Member
    Xecure
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    I really don’t understand what you are trying to say.

    antiX 64 already has i386 set up as optional architecture for packages (no need to do anything).
    Simply do
    apt list -a <package-name>
    for example, geany
    apt list -a geany
    and you will see that apt can find both amd64 and i386 packages. So, they ARE available.

    If you want to install wine32, install wine32 (not wine).

    If you want to install a specific package in i386 architecture, tell apt to install it.
    sudo apt install <package-name>:i386

    I think what you are trying to say and you didn’t know, is that Debian has enabled by default “install Recommends” (which installs all kind of shit you don’t need apart from the main dependencies) and antiX doesn’t.
    If you want to enable Install-recommends, you need to edit /etc/apt/apt.conf and enable Recommends:
    APT::Install-Recommends "1";

    antiX Live system enthusiast.
    General Live Boot Parameters for antiX.

    #67643
    Member
    gusi
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    NO NO

    This must come automaticly , has nothing to do with “avaiable”

    i can that do , install 386-pakets manually
    but not good for updates ,
    Blechbit would remove all these programs , when the architecture is only amd64

    Make the test: i have install the wine 32 manually
    then a sudo apt autoremove has delete the whole 32-libs

    here is a Difference to orig Debian -buster
    apt-install wine –> install aut. wine64 + wine32

    and here wine –> only wine64

    ..and that is an bug !
    u dont know , what happen with u 32-bit progs, when the architecture is not correct set in OS

    #67644
    Member
    Xecure
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    Make the test: i have install the wine 32 manually
    then a sudo apt autoremove has delete the whole 32-libs

    False.

    $ sudo apt install wine32
    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree... Done
    Reading state information... Done
    The following additional packages will be installed:
      gcc-10-base:i386 libasound2:i386 libasyncns0:i386 libblkid1:i386
      [...]
    0 upgraded, 121 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
    Need to get 65.3 MB of archives.
    After this operation, 358 MB of additional disk space will be used.
    Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
    [...]
    Setcap worked! gst-ptp-helper is not suid!
    Setting up libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0:i386 (1.18.4-2) ...
    Setting up libfaudio0:i386 (21.02-1) ...
    Setting up libwine:i386 (5.0.3-3) ...
    Setting up wine32:i386 (5.0.3-3) ...
    Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.31-13) ...
    pc@antix21:~
    $ sudo apt autoremove
    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree... Done
    Reading state information... Done
    0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

    Do as I say and enable Install-recommends. Then remove wine and wine32 and then install only wine. You will see the same result you expect in Debian.

    antiX Live system enthusiast.
    General Live Boot Parameters for antiX.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.