BashTop & BpyTop

Forum Forums General Tips and Tricks BashTop & BpyTop

  • This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated Sep 13-3:38 pm by manyroads.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #41511
    Member
    manyroads

      I’m probably the only person here trying to use these system monitoring tools. (They are to my mind much ‘better’ than htop.) Anyway on my modified antiX19 dwm base, Bashtop (the bash version) works but BpyTop (the python version) does not.

      Has anyone experienced a similar problem? If so, were you able to ‘fix’ it. Obviously I can live with this bug… (self-induced probably).

      Pax vobiscum,
      Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
      "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
      dwm & i3wm ~Reg. Linux User #449130
      20 Jan 2021 ~ "End of an Error"

      #41518
      Member
      Xecure
        Helpful
        Up
        0
        ::

        BpyTop

        Where did you get this script? It probably needs a few packages that you don’t have installed in your system. Does the developer list the python modules needed for it to work? Does the terminal output explain in what lines the script fails? Probably we could follow the terminal output for clues to get it to work.

        antiX Live system enthusiast.
        General Live Boot Parameters for antiX.

        #41541
        Member
        manyroads
          Helpful
          Up
          0
          ::

          I found the tool here:

          https://github.com/aristocratos/bpytop

          There are no error messages…

          • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by manyroads.

          Pax vobiscum,
          Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
          "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
          dwm & i3wm ~Reg. Linux User #449130
          20 Jan 2021 ~ "End of an Error"

          #41556
          Member
          Xecure
            Helpful
            Up
            0
            ::

            Based on the github page:

            Debian based

            Available for debian/ubuntu from Azlux’s repository

            On that site:

                echo "deb http://packages.azlux.fr/debian/ buster main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azlux.list
                wget -qO - https://azlux.fr/repo.gpg.key | sudo apt-key add -

            Then:
            sudo apt update && sudo apt install --install-recommends bpytop

            Whoever packaged it confused some real dependencies with recommended dependencies.

            Test it. It worked for me.

            antiX Live system enthusiast.
            General Live Boot Parameters for antiX.

            #41579
            Member
            ile
              Helpful
              Up
              0
              ::

              hello manyroads and everyone
              rofi-top. recently stumbled upon rofi-top. how would it fit your better to less better tops? which make the better list? is there a difference between clicking and keyboarding? Can there be reviews here?

              #41608
              Member
              manyroads
                Helpful
                Up
                0
                ::

                @xecure I tried the repo route… it failed for me. I’m still only able to use bashtop.

                $     wget -qO - https://azlux.fr/repo.gpg.key | sudo apt-key add -
                [...]
                gpg: key DC30D7C23CBBABEE: 4 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key 4DFAB270CAA96DFA: 4 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key DCC9EFBF77E11517: 2 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key 7638D0442B90D010: 4 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key 9D6D8F6BC857C906: 4 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key CBF8D6FD518E17E1: 2 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key E0B11894F66AEC98: 5 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key EDA0D2388AE22BA9: 5 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key EF0F382A1A7B6500: 2 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key 5C808C2B65558117: 12 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: key A0E2FC066309A9C9: 1 signature not checked due to a missing key
                gpg: key 85A3D26506C4AE2A: 2 signatures not checked due to missing keys
                gpg: Total number processed: 16
                gpg:       skipped new keys: 16
                • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by manyroads.
                • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by manyroads.

                Pax vobiscum,
                Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
                "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
                dwm & i3wm ~Reg. Linux User #449130
                20 Jan 2021 ~ "End of an Error"

                #41613
                Member
                manyroads
                  Helpful
                  Up
                  0
                  ::

                  @ile here is what I get when I attempt to install rofi-top

                  configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.40 gio-unix-2.0 gmodule-2.0 libgtop-2.0) were not met:
                   
                  No package 'libgtop-2.0' found
                   
                  Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
                  installed software in a non-standard prefix.

                  I tried installing different/ additional libgtop versions and glib…. the error persists.

                    EDIT

                  The dev version worked… but now rofi is undiscoverable by the apps….

                  checking for rofi... no
                  configure: error: Package requirements (rofi) were not met:
                   
                  No package 'rofi' found
                   
                  Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
                  installed software in a non-standard prefix.
                   
                  Alternatively, you may set the environment variables rofi_CFLAGS
                  and rofi_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
                  See the pkg-config man page for more details.

                  This is pretty poorly pieced together for a debian based system (methinks).

                  • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by manyroads.
                  • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by manyroads.
                  • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by manyroads.

                  Pax vobiscum,
                  Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
                  "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
                  dwm & i3wm ~Reg. Linux User #449130
                  20 Jan 2021 ~ "End of an Error"

                Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.