Forum › Forums › antiX-development › Development › buster – elogind and policykit-1
- This topic has 19 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated Feb 25-2:27 pm by dolphin_oracle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 22, 2019 at 4:03 pm #18826Member
v3g4n
::Fixed network-manager should now be in the repos.
Looks like we are needing network-manager_1.14.4-4.0nosystemd2_amd64.deb for testing and sid. i386 packages is already available. Probably already aware though. ;^)
The following packages have unmet dependencies: network-manager : Depends: libnm0 (= 1.14.4-4.0nosystemd1) but 1.14.4-4.0nosystemd2 is to be installed- This reply was modified 4 years, 2 months ago by v3g4n.
February 23, 2019 at 11:39 am #18835Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::Yeah, that deb got lost somewhere between Greece and Canada. Patience, please.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
February 23, 2019 at 12:03 pm #18837Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::Should be ok now.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
February 25, 2019 at 6:46 am #18869Forum Admin
dolphin_oracle
::I’m glad this gets network-manager working for those that want it.
I’m still a little concerned about the location issue for the policy conf files. Debian packages in testing are putting those files in /usr/share/dbus-1 instead of /etc/dbus-1, but I get the feeling that our polkitd (or mabye dbus, not sure how all this works) is not sourcing from that location. anti alluded to this above and I think I’m sharing this concern.
with gksu not present in buster (even if its present in antiX), I expect more apps to be utilizing policykit, maybe even internally like network-manager does, so this may be a sign of a broader issue. we can revist once the 17.4 is out.
February 25, 2019 at 2:27 pm #18879Forum Admin
dolphin_oracle
::uh oh…looks like debian’s policykit-1 does not current take elogind into account. many of the problems we are seeing might be tied to this underlying issue.
bug report (apparently filed today) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923244
I think the poster is one of the crew trying to keep debian more init-system agnostic. He says he has proof of concept patches, which might be useful for antiX when we get to testing.
- This reply was modified 4 years, 2 months ago by dolphin_oracle.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.