debian vs. nosystemd repository โ€“ upgrades of cups and libsane?

Forum Forums News Sid Upgraders debian vs. nosystemd repository โ€“ upgrades of cups and libsane?

  • This topic has 6 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated Oct 12-9:34 am by wildstar84.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #19935
    Member
    Xaver

      In antiX sid libsane and cups can be upgraded:

      cups/unstable 2.2.10-5 amd64 [upgradable from: 2.2.10-4.0nosystemd1]
      libsane/unstable 1.0.27-3.2 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.0.27-3.1.0nosystemd1]

      The new versions are in the debian repo only. No dependencies to systemd/libsystemd0 are indicated.
      What are the reasons for the nosystemd versions?
      Are the upgrades safe or should I keep them on hold?
      (# apt-mark hold cups-common cups-ppdc cups-server-common libcups2 libsane sane-utils)

      • This topic was modified 4 years, 1 month ago by Xaver.
      #19941
      Forum Admin
      anticapitalista
        Helpful
        Up
        0
        ::

        Recently, elogind in Debian sid had this change: libelogind0 is ABI compatible with libsystemd0

        Which basically means that if elogind is installed, cups can be installed without dragging in libsystemd0.

        Great for me since I won’t have to build so many nosystemd debs anymore.

        Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

        antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

        #20091
        Member
        eriefisher
          Helpful
          Up
          0
          ::

          I just recently upgraded and elogind removed libsystemd0.

          #23458
          Member
          wildstar84
            Helpful
            Up
            0
            ::

            Well, looks like libelogind’s antivirus feature is working, it removed a virus for you! LOL ๐Ÿ˜€

            #23461
            Anonymous
              Helpful
              Up
              0
              ::

              Are you a system administrator so that systemd bothers you?

              #23519
              Member
              olsztyn
                Helpful
                Up
                0
                ::

                Are you a system administrator so that systemd bothers you?

                I do not think is is a question of being a system administrator or just user. It is rather a question of clean system architecture.

                Live antiX Boot Options (Previously posted by Xecure):
                https://antixlinuxfan.miraheze.org/wiki/Table_of_antiX_Boot_Parameters

                #27936
                Member
                wildstar84
                  Helpful
                  Up
                  0
                  ::

                  Yes, I’m both a sysadmin & an abUser – I maintain and use my laptops running Linux! ๐Ÿ˜€ My 1st experience w/systemD was years ago at work, finding it very complicated and difficult to change configuration – vs. traditional init.d/rc#.d scripts. Now, the more I learn a/b systemD trying to take over the world and be forced upon ppl. (NOT the Linux/OpenSource way), the more I DON’T like it! That’s just my 2ยข

                Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.