dwmX-1.0 layla

Forum Forums General Other Distros dwmX-1.0 layla

  • This topic has 20 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated Apr 6-12:54 pm by masinick.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #27557
    Member
    manyroadsmanyroads

    This is getting some good notice… for any interested in dwm.

    https://sourceforge.net/projects/dwmx/

    Pax vobiscum,
    Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
    MX-19 kernel: 5.2.21-antix.1-amd64-smp
    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
    MX- antiX- bspwm, hlwm, xfce4

    #27558
    Forum Admin
    anticapitalistaanticapitalista

    ..and systemd 🙂

    plus it doesn’t boot in virtualbox on my laptop (running antiX-17)unless I choose failsafe option.

    • This reply was modified 10 months, 2 weeks ago by anticapitalista.
    • This reply was modified 10 months, 2 weeks ago by anticapitalista.

    Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

    antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

    #27566
    Member
    manyroadsmanyroads

    Yes the systemd burden is there. As for VBox… that seems like a strange ‘feature’.

    If I get the tie, I may try building something on antiX19 (after release) that uses the layla dotfiles etc.;)

    Pax vobiscum,
    Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
    MX-19 kernel: 5.2.21-antix.1-amd64-smp
    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
    MX- antiX- bspwm, hlwm, xfce4

    #27567
    AvatarAnonymous

    The Live behaves also in QEMU very stubbornly.
    The keyboard layout and the language settings can only be set during installation, which does not affect the reboot immediately. It is a tinkering.

    I think it is absolutely important to use the refractainstaller in text mode, otherwise it won’t work for “a foreigner”.

    No comparison with antiX ! 😉

    #31614
    Member
    rust collectorrust collector

    this thing starts right up in vbox here. (on mx)
    looks fun

    #34379
    Member
    AvatarBobC

    Any more comments on it?

    Manyroads, did you try running it off antiX instead?

    If you were going to do that, which flavor of antiX would be easiest to build it from?

    #34399
    Member
    manyroadsmanyroads

    Hi BobC. No I have not tried.

    Pax vobiscum,
    Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
    MX-19 kernel: 5.2.21-antix.1-amd64-smp
    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
    MX- antiX- bspwm, hlwm, xfce4

    #34401
    Member
    KooKoo

    I like the look of this will install on my X220.

    T430 MX-19 , antiX-19 runit.

    #34402
    Member
    manyroadsmanyroads

    I just tried it. It is very nice. What a splendid way to learn dwm.

    Pax vobiscum,
    Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
    MX-19 kernel: 5.2.21-antix.1-amd64-smp
    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
    MX- antiX- bspwm, hlwm, xfce4

    #34403
    Member
    AvatarBobC

    I’m using my packagecomp to build a antiX 19.2 runit 386 version just for fun. If it goes well I should be done by supper. If not, well… You know…

    #34404
    Moderator
    masinickmasinick

    I’m using my packagecomp to build a antiX 19.2 runit 386 version just for fun. If it goes well I should be done by supper. If not, well… You know…

    I’ll build another one too just for fun.

    I do already have a runit version installed and a regular full version, but this’ll be good practice.

    This tine I’ll build a full runit based version using the 19.2 release, but I won’t do dwm, I’ll use one of the main window managers
    and mainly experiment with persistence or rebuilding directly from the snapped image; whatever I can figure out.

    • This reply was modified 4 months ago by masinick.
    • This reply was modified 4 months ago by masinick.

    Brian Masinick

    #34406
    Member
    AvatarBobC

    I’ve never tried my packagecomp with a Debian based distro, nor from a core based or 386 based distro, and never tried runit.

    I may run into the “many points of failure” scenario.

    So far, I’m doing ok. I have a system booting into the antiX 386 runit core, and got the dwmx home and etc copied in to a holding area. I may cheat and hard wire it for now…

    #34409
    Member
    AvatarBobC

    Hmmmmm, and *I* thought DWM was supposed to be SIMPLE

    #34410
    Member
    AvatarBobC

    I have a good chunk of it running, now. All of the what I would guess would be important packages but one loaded… Working on getting jgmenu next.

    #34412
    Moderator
    masinickmasinick

    I have created a new USB containing a n antiX 19.2 runit version installed using IceWM.

    I am about to remaster the changes I have made

    Brian Masinick

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.