experimental 5.4 kernel in repo

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

I have made a bleeding edge 5.4 kernel available to antiX-19 64 bit users (buster, testing and sid).

This may be useful for those with very new hardware.

Note: Virtualbox, broadcom-sta, ndiswrapper (and probably nvidia) drivers will not build.

• This topic was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by anticapitalista. Reason: more info

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Member VW]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Hey way cool! It’s installed and working AOK. Many thanks anti.

• This reply was modified 3 years, 5 months ago by VW.

“These are the times that try men's souls" - Thomas Paine

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

testing/sid versions to hit repos soon.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Anonymous]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Thanks anti. Installed in my 19-base frugal and working fine.

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

anticapitalista wrote:

testing/sid versions to hit repos soon.

Now in repos – enjoy!

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Member fungalnet]

Helpful

Up

0

::

After 4.20 which run like a bullet train, 5.1 5.2 seem lithargic. 5.3 again on my hardware seemed to be running fast and with lower ram. 5.4 is dragging its feet again. This is from arch, void, and antix. Since antiX didn’t produce a single 5.3 image I used the one from Debian. So it is triple checked with same results. Even 4.19 is not as responsive as 5.3 is. So I am hoping 5.3 would be characterised as LTS before it is abandoned, because my first impression with 5.4 is really bad. I reverted to 5.3 in all systems.
Hw 7yr old intel/intel

anti-X - Adélie - obarun - systemd Free Space

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

fungalnet wrote:

After 4.20 which run like a bullet train, 5.1 5.2 seem lithargic. 5.3 again on my hardware seemed to be running fast and with lower ram. 5.4 is dragging its feet again. This is from arch, void, and antix. Since antiX didn’t produce a single 5.3 image I used the one from Debian. So it is triple checked with same results. Even 4.19 is not as responsive as 5.3 is. So I am hoping 5.3 would be characterised as LTS before it is abandoned, because my first impression with 5.4 is really bad. I reverted to 5.3 in all systems.
Hw 7yr old intel/intel

A 5.3.14 antiX kernel for buster, stretch and sid is now available.(64 bit only)

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Author]

Posts