[Solved] Hash Sum mismatch apt-get on adobe-flashplugin amd64 from repo antixlin

[Member roytobin]

Hash Sum mismatch apt-get on adobe-flashplugin amd64 from repo antixlinux.com stretch/main

Hi,
I get failure on ‘apt-get update’ re: package adobe-flashplugin amd64
attempting to upgrade to 20180313.1-1mx17+1. All other package upgrades
to antix 17.1 are OK. I get ‘Hash Sum mismatch’

I tried the usual things I found on the Net, eg.:
apt-get clean
rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
apt-get clean
apt-get update

And I also waited another day thinking the mirrors just need to sync.
Alas, today I still get the error message. As this involves a
antix-specific repo (not a more global debian repo) I thought I’d
inquire to assure nothing is misconfigured. Perhaps only the amd64 repo
is affected.

The machine’s antix.list has only:
deb http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch stretch main nosystemd

I’m in no hurry for this upgrade; I don’t want to bypass the hash signature
check.

Thanks

• This topic was modified 5 years, 1 month ago by roytobin. Reason: "solved" added to subject

[Member roytobin]

Helpful

Up

0

::

2nd attept to attach terminal log of the problem…

[Forum Admin anticapitalista]

Helpful

Up

0

::

It seems that you are the only one getting this error since nobody else has reported it.

You could try another mirror. List here: antix-packages mirrors

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

[Member roytobin]

Helpful

Up

0

::

Thanks, Success: switching to different repo allowed me to install
the adobe-flashplugin upgrade.

The only other weird thing is I had a broken package
adobe-flash-properties-gtk that I first removed. Then, when selecting
adobe-flashplugin to upgrade (from different repo), the adobe-flash*gtk
package was not suggested as well. Perhaps the broken package matter
is entirely unrelated…how could a broken package cause a download hash
sum mismatch in a different package? (rhetorical)

BTW, the terminal transcript I attemped to attach to the post is 52
lines long and under 3K in size. I do not know why the forum software
said “Sorry, this file type is not permitted for security reasons.”
Being able to attach a log is useful for the generous people who help
out those new to antix. Is below to document for the record.

Thanks.

<snip>
Get:1 http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch stretch/main amd64 adobe-flashplugin amd64 1:2018
0313.1-1mx17+1 [9792 kB]
Err:1 http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch stretch/main amd64 adobe-flashplugin amd64 1:2018
0313.1-1mx17+1
Hash Sum mismatch
Hashes of expected file:
– SHA256:4862664721f210bd8b8733783641f57cbbbdc6d76b53653ce272b626784486b8
– SHA1:5776e64b3d514f2d426c75339723ddae4674e986 [weak]
– MD5Sum:e70bb6034731200fcb977e730ad6be76 [weak]
– Filesize:9791726 [weak]
Hashes of received file:
– SHA256:c3b6bab11b1fb62756b05062dd147a22d6a499815b129bcc15178d6353fc9ec8
– SHA1:4c09cff9e06db5f1ab0cef37e4de7923c5d9ce54 [weak]
– MD5Sum:b635eb08932b1fd9825ec3f5f6569862 [weak]
– Filesize:9791726 [weak]
Last modification reported: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:11:48 +0000
Fetched 9792 kB in 25s (380 kB/s)
E: Failed to fetch http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch/pool/main/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20180313.1-1mx17+1_amd64.deb Hash Sum mismatch
Hashes of expected file:
– SHA256:4862664721f210bd8b8733783641f57cbbbdc6d76b53653ce272b626784486b8
– SHA1:5776e64b3d514f2d426c75339723ddae4674e986 [weak]
– MD5Sum:e70bb6034731200fcb977e730ad6be76 [weak]
– Filesize:9791726 [weak]
Hashes of received file:
– SHA256:c3b6bab11b1fb62756b05062dd147a22d6a499815b129bcc15178d6353fc9ec8
– SHA1:4c09cff9e06db5f1ab0cef37e4de7923c5d9ce54 [weak]
– MD5Sum:b635eb08932b1fd9825ec3f5f6569862 [weak]
– Filesize:9791726 [weak]
Last modification reported: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:11:48 +0000
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with –fix-missing?

[Author]

Posts