Forum › Forums › antiX-development › Development › Is antiX going to get s6 init manager?
- This topic has 70 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated Oct 31-8:51 pm by mobinmob.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 18, 2021 at 3:07 pm #54548Member
andyprough
I see that s6 is in the antiX repo since November: https://mirrors.evowise.com/mxlinux-packages/antix/buster/pool/main/s/s6/
Just wondering if that’s in the plans to offer an s6 init option in the future? Or is it already working and ready to try? A search for the term s6 in the forum turns up no results for me.
February 18, 2021 at 5:44 pm #54550Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::Perhaps a long-term plan since I haven’t got it to work in antiX (yet).
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
February 18, 2021 at 8:37 pm #54572Member
andyprough
::OK good to know. I tried it on Artix where it was mildly unstable, but I’ve been hearing a lot of praise for it.
February 18, 2021 at 8:43 pm #54573Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::Obarun has the best implementation of s6 IMO.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
February 21, 2021 at 10:38 pm #54746Membereric
::A POC was made from a long time now. This is old thread, but it worked before and should work today: https://forum.obarun.org/viewtopic.php?id=981
February 22, 2021 at 1:31 am #54752Member
andyprough
::A POC was made from a long time now. This is old thread, but it worked before and should work today: https://forum.obarun.org/viewtopic.php?id=981
Your link links to this blog post where the author expounds on his method of trying to get s6 working on antiX: https://sysdfree.wordpress.com/2019/12/15/291/
anticapitalista was commenting on that same blog post in December 2019, saying that he was trying that method: https://sysdfree.wordpress.com/2019/12/15/291/#comment-4246
But in his post earlier in this thread anticapitalista says he did not get it to work. It would therefore seem that the method does not actually work on antiX.
February 23, 2021 at 8:57 pm #54841Membereric
::I installed Antix on a VM from the antiX-19.2_x64-full.iso
I modified the /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.conf to get a correct repo.
then i launched this script below.
It install all the necessary things and reboot the machine, easy peasy!
I didn’t did any more test but surely some adjustment need to be made for Antix policies. Anyway, the machine boot correctly and launch the X with slim.
#!/bin/bash #antix from full iso TMP="/tmp/install" skalibs_tag="v2.10.0.0" execline_tag="v2.7.0.0" s6_tag="v2.10.0.0" s6_rc_tag="v0.5.2.1" oblibs_tag="v0.1.3.0" _66_tag="v0.6.1.1" _66_tools_tag="v0.0.7.1" s6_linux_utils_tag="v2.5.1.4" s6_portable_utils_tag="v2.2.3.1" flags_path=( --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --bindir=/bin --shebangdir=/bin --sbindir=/sbin --enable-shared --disable-allstatic --disable-static ) # lowdown package doesn't exist on Antix, so do not try to build # the documentation _sed_lowdown() { sed 's:^LOWDOWN.*$::' -i ${1} } prepare_build() { apt update || return 1 apt install git || return 1 apt install build-essential || return 1 mkdir ${TMP} } ## skalibs build_skalibs() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://github.com/skarnet/skalibs cd skalibs git checkout tags/"${skalibs_tag}" ./configure ${flags_path[@]} make clean make install || return 1 } ## execline build_execline() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://github.com/skarnet/execline cd execline git checkout tags/"${execline_tag}" ./configure ${flags_path[@]} make clean make install || return 1 } ## s6 build_s6() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://github.com/skarnet/s6 cd s6 git checkout tags/"${s6_tag}" ./configure ${flags_path[@]} --with-dynlib=/usr/lib/execline make clean make install || return 1 } ## s6-rc build_s6_rc() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://github.com/skarnet/s6-rc cd s6-rc git checkout tags/"${s6_rc_tag}" ./configure ${flags_path[@]} make clean make install || return 1 } ## s6-linux-utils build_s6_linux-utils() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://github.com/skarnet/s6-linux-utils cd s6-linux-utils git checkout tags/"${s6_linux_utils_tag}" ./configure ${flags_path[@]} make clean make install || return 1 } ## s6-portable-utils build_s6_portable-utils() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://github.com/skarnet/s6-portable-utils cd s6-portable-utils git checkout tags/"${s6_portable_utils_tag}" ./configure ${flags_path[@]} make clean make install || return 1 } ## oblibs build_oblibs() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://framagit.org/obarun/oblibs cd oblibs git checkout tags/"${oblibs_tag}" ./configure ${flags_path[@]} make clean make install || return 1 } ## 66 build_66() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://framagit.org/obarun/66 cd 66 _sed_lowdown Makefile git checkout tags/"${_66_tag}" ./configure ${flags_path[@]} make clean make install || return 1 } ## 66-tools build_66-tools() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://framagit.org/obarun/66-tools cd 66-tools _sed_lowdown Makefile git checkout tags/"${_66_tools_tag}" ./configure ${flags_path[@]} make clean make install || return 1 } cp_skeleton() { cp -f /etc/66/{init,halt,reboot,poweroff,shutdown} /sbin/ || return 1 sed 's:^66-boot.*$:66-boot -m:' -i /sbin/init } prepare_boot() { cd ${TMP} git clone https://framagit.org/pkg/obmods/boot-66serv cd boot-66serv _sed_lowdown Makefile ./configure make install || return 1 } build_tree() { ## don't crash here in case of multiple use of the script 66-tree -n boot 66-enable -t boot boot@system || return 1 BOOT_CONF="$(readlink /etc/66/conf/boot@system/version)" cp "${BOOT_CONF}/.boot@system" "${BOOT_CONF}/boot@system" || return 1 66-env -t boot -r 'CGROUPS=!no' boot@system || return 1 66-enable -F -t boot boot@system || return 1 dd if=/dev/urandom of=/var/lib/random-seed count=1 bs=512 status=none || return 1 } build_tree_root() { 66-tree -cnE root exec 3>&1 1>/etc/66/service/slim cat <<EOF [main] @type = oneshot @version = 0.0.1 @description = "Slim daemon" @user = ( root ) [start] @execute = ( slim ) EOF exec 1>&3 3>&- 66-enable slim } _run() { if ! ${1} ; then printf "%s\n" "unable to ${2} ${1#*_}" exit 1 fi } ## do it _run prepare_build "install" _run build_skalibs "skalibs" _run build_execline "execline" _run build_s6 "s6" _run build_s6_rc "s6-rc" _run build_s6_linux-utils "s6-linux-utils" _run build_s6_portable-utils "s6-portable-utils" _run build_oblibs "oblibs" _run build_66 "66" _run build_66-tools "66-tools" cd ${TMP} _run cp_skeleton "copy" # build and remove a dummy tree to have the /usr/share/66 created 66-tree -n dummy 66-tree -R dummy _run prepare_boot "build" _run build_tree "build" _run build_tree_root "build" # reboot of the machine 66-hpr -r -f- This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by eric.
- This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by eric.
February 23, 2021 at 10:05 pm #54845Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::WOW! Thanks for that eric. I’ll give it a try as soon as I can.
You said you
modified the /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.conf to get a correct repo.
What exactly did you change?
I really do admire all your work on Obarun and s6/66 integration and I hope we can incorporate it into antiX.
- This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by anticapitalista.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
February 24, 2021 at 12:29 am #54849Membereric
::What exactly did you change?
The installer put an invalid Antix mirror list at /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.conf. Well, we know that the life of a mirrorlist can be erratic 🙂 and i picked the old ISO :/(i was lazy to download the fresh one due of my poor connection). So, i took one from your package mirror list.
I hope we can incorporate it into antiX
It will be a pleasure to help you to accomplish it and really interesting for me because it may increase the portability of the 66 tools depending of the issues meets.
Please free to send me a mail if you need my help.
February 24, 2021 at 10:23 pm #54877Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::eric’s script works very well in my ‘brief’ test.
There are some issues, down to differences in the boot scripts re Debian(antiX)/arch(obarun).More testing needed, but looking good.
(Debian s6 does not work very well at all)
added: live version gives some kernel error at boot.
- This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by anticapitalista.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
February 25, 2021 at 5:15 am #54885Member
andyprough
::Nice work there Eric. The install script worked on my antiX Libre respin. eth0 is down for the moment, the OS threw up an “Unable to find a connection to the system bus” error for connman.
February 25, 2021 at 8:11 am #54887Membereric
::down to differences in the boot scripts re Debian(antiX)/arch(obarun).
Let me the time to make some test to see what happens.
“Unable to find a connection to the system bus”
The script just install the necessary to boot the machine and do not add runtime service like dbus (except slim). You need to enable what you need. You can find good example here https://framagit.org/pkg/observice and here https://github.com/mobinmob/void-66-services/tree/samba/usr/share/66/service
- This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by eric.
February 25, 2021 at 10:24 am #54896Member
fungalnet
::I never had this building problem in sid/unstable because:
liblowdown-dev/unstable 0.8.1-1 amd64 Simple markdown translator (development files) lowdown/unstable 0.8.1-1 amd64 Simple markdown translatorFebruary 25, 2021 at 10:49 am #54898Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::lowdown is only in bullseye/testing and sid repos, not present stable/buster (Eric tested using antiX-19/buster)
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
February 25, 2021 at 12:58 pm #54899 -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
