Is antiX going to get s6 init manager?

Forum Forums antiX-development Development Is antiX going to get s6 init manager?

  • This topic has 67 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated May 27-1:01 pm by olsztyn.
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 67 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #55225
    Member
    linuxdaddy
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    I did it says
    strace: Can't stat '/usr/66-scandir': No such file or directory

    • This reply was modified 7 months, 2 weeks ago by linuxdaddy. Reason: fixed typo

    Normal == πŸ™‚
    depends on the surrounding crowd ?!

    #55227
    Member
    eric
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    not /usr but /usr/bin/66-scandir πŸ™‚

    #55228
    Member
    linuxdaddy
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    ok that correction spit out a bunch of info.
    on this when I rebooted is mounted ro like normal and
    verbosity=4 on kernel line.

    Attachments:

    Normal == πŸ™‚
    depends on the surrounding crowd ?!

    #55230
    Member
    linuxdaddy
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    htop also shows 66-boot -m as pid 1 running
    also this is a fresh install and hasn’t been updated at all from the
    19.3-runit-32-bit full iso and is on a p-4 hp zv-5000 laptop.

    • This reply was modified 7 months, 2 weeks ago by linuxdaddy. Reason: added to it

    Normal == πŸ™‚
    depends on the surrounding crowd ?!

    #55233
    Member
    linuxdaddy
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    sorry for typo and quick misread. been hectic lately.

    Normal == πŸ™‚
    depends on the surrounding crowd ?!

    #55234
    Member
    linuxdaddy
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    want to switch test to bullseye and build documentation for this? or
    stick to buster.

    Normal == πŸ™‚
    depends on the surrounding crowd ?!

    #55235
    Member
    eric
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    To be honest i don’t know what happens here. I expected a crash at the 66-scandir call and it’s not the case. The 66-scandir finish correctly. So nothing wrong on the 66-scandir code itself.

    I don’t understand why the call by 66-boot to the 66-scandir tool sent an error.
    Need reflexion….
    What is puzzled me it’s that Void do not have the trouble.

    #55236
    Member
    linuxdaddy
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    ? I don’t use void and no idea just trying to help on a clean test machine.

    • This reply was modified 7 months, 2 weeks ago by linuxdaddy. Reason: fixed typo

    Normal == πŸ™‚
    depends on the surrounding crowd ?!

    #55238
    Member
    fungalnet
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    301 openat(AT_FDCWD, “/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/sse2/liboblibs.so.0.1”, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
    301 openat(AT_FDCWD, “/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/liboblibs.so.0.1”, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
    301 openat(AT_FDCWD, “/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/liboblibs.so.0.1”, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
    301 openat(AT_FDCWD, “/lib/i386-linux-gnu/liboblibs.so.0.1”, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
    301 openat(AT_FDCWD, “/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/sse2/liboblibs.so.0.1”, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
    301 openat(AT_FDCWD, “/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/liboblibs.so.0.1”, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
    301 openat(AT_FDCWD, “/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/liboblibs.so.0.1”, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
    301 openat(AT_FDCWD, “/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/liboblibs.so.0.1”, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
    301 openat(AT_FDCWD, “/lib/liboblibs.so.0.1”

    Maybe some linking or different configuration path would help?
    And what is calling for liboblibs.so.0.1?

    • This reply was modified 7 months, 2 weeks ago by fungalnet.
    #55240
    Member
    eric
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    @linuxdaddy
    I really appreciated your contributions :).

    @fungalnet
    Good catch. Maybe @anticapitalista can try to build it in static mode instead of shared to see what happens.

    #55261
    Member
    mobinmob
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    @linuxdaddy
    I really appreciated your contributions :).


    @fungalnet

    Good catch. Maybe @anticapitalista can try to build it in static mode instead of shared to see what happens.

    I have --libdir=/usr/lib in my oblibs packaging template and --with-lib=${XBPS_CROSS_BASE}/usr/lib in the 66 and 66-tools templates. I am aware that these have to do with static libs, but maybe it makes sense using something like --with-dynlib=/usr/lib in the build script or indeed make a static build. /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/liboblibs.so.0.1 seems something that has do with cross-building.

    • This reply was modified 7 months, 2 weeks ago by mobinmob.
    #55280
    Member
    linuxdaddy
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    @eric : you’re welcome hopefully it helps pinpoint the problem

    Normal == πŸ™‚
    depends on the surrounding crowd ?!

    #55348
    Member
    oops
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    antiX-21-a1 running s6/66 with sysvinit removed.

    After few tests here too (AMD64), s6/66 init seems promising for antiX.

    • This reply was modified 7 months, 2 weeks ago by oops.
    • This reply was modified 7 months, 2 weeks ago by oops.
    #55351
    Member
    fungalnet
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    When I looked for i386 image to test with all I found was 19, is there a link to this 21-beta?
    I assume that if you switch repos to next level you get 21 after dist-upgrade.

    #55354
    Member
    userzero
    Helpful
    Up
    0

    Not available for i386.

    https://sourceforge.net/projects/antix-linux/files/Testing/

    “I assume that if you switch repos to next level you get 21 after dist-upgrade”

    antiX-FAQ:

    If you have a very old desktop/laptop with less than 256MB RAM (PII, PIII), or you want a desktop with “the basics”, it is probably best to use antiX-base.

    If you want complete control over what applications to install and know the Debian system fairly well, then use antiX-core or antiX-net since both these do not include X.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 67 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.