[SOLVED] libgtk2.0-dev have bad dependecies

  • This topic has 10 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated May 28-5:26 am by sybok.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #60233
    Member
    bedna

      sudo apt install libgtk2.0-dev
      Reading package lists… Done
      Building dependency tree
      Reading state information… Done
      Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
      requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
      distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
      or been moved out of Incoming.
      The following information may help to resolve the situation:

      The following packages have unmet dependencies:
      libgtk2.0-dev : Depends: libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.24.32-3) but 2.24.32-4.0antix1 is to be installed
      E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

      • This topic was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by Brian Masinick. Reason: Moderator marked SOLVED
      • This topic was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by Brian Masinick.
      #60238
      Member
      sybok
        Helpful
        Up
        0
        ::

        Please provide more information about your system, paste output of the command
        inxi -Fxzr

        I have antiX 19 64bit testing.
        ‘sudo apt install libgtk2.0-dev’ seems to resolve the dependencies correctly (will install a large bunch of additional stuff).
        I did not proceed with the installation.

        • This reply was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by sybok. Reason: Add the '-r' (= '--repos' = repository) switch
        #60241
        Anonymous
          Helpful
          Up
          0
          ::

          Here, we should probably ask to see the output of
          inxi -Fxzr

          bedna may be dealing with non-standard repositories (or a problematic mirrored repository)

          edit:

          Yes, I checked on antiX19 with stock (default) repositories and see that the Debian-maintained package does (stupidly, unnecessarily) declare a dependency on EXACTLY libgtk2.0-0 v2.24.32-3

          …yet it (libgtk2.0-dev) is, in fact, installable on the antiX19 stock system when I checked just now.

          $ apt show libgtk2.0-dev
          Package: libgtk2.0-dev
          Source: gtk+2.0
          Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers <pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
          Depends: libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.24.32-3), gir1.2-gtk-2.0 (= 2.24.32-3), libgtk2.0-common, libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.27.3), libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev (>= 2.21.0), libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.20), libatk1.0-dev (>= 1.29.2), libcairo2-dev (>= 1.6.4-6.1), libx11-dev (>= 2:1.0.0-6), libxext-dev (>= 1:1.0.1-2), libxinerama-dev (>= 1:1.0.1-4.1), libxi-dev (>= 1:1.0.1-4), libxrandr-dev (>= 2:1.2.99), libxcursor-dev, libxfixes-dev (>= 1:3.0.0-3), libxcomposite-dev (>= 1:0.2.0-3), libxdamage-dev (>= 1:1.0.1-3), pkg-config (>= 0.26-1), libxml2-utils

          #60244
          Member
          sybok
            Helpful
            Up
            0
            ::

            @skidoo: Indeed, my bad. Post corrected.

            #60253
            Anonymous
              Helpful
              Up
              0
              ::

              move over, make room for my sleepy bad also.
              I ranted about GnomeTeam, then edited my post again to redact the rant after I belatedly checked and discovered the -dev package is (here, on a tested system) still installable.

              #60280
              Member
              bedna
                Helpful
                Up
                0
                ::
                inxi -Fxzr
                System:    Host: antix1 Kernel: 4.9.0-264-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 8.3.0 Desktop: IceWM 2.3.4 
                           Distro: antiX-19.4_x64-full Grup Yorum 20 May 2021 base: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) 
                Machine:   Type: Virtualbox System: innotek product: VirtualBox v: 1.2 serial: <filter> 
                           Mobo: Oracle model: VirtualBox v: 1.2 serial: <filter> BIOS: innotek v: VirtualBox date: 12/01/2006 
                Battery:   ID-1: BAT0 charge: 48.5 Wh condition: 50.0/50.0 Wh (100%) model: innotek 1 status: Discharging 
                CPU:       Topology: Single Core model: Intel Core i7-6500U bits: 64 type: MCP arch: Skylake rev: 3 L2 cache: 4096 KiB 
                           flags: avx avx2 lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 bogomips: 5183 
                           Speed: 2592 MHz min/max: N/A Core speed (MHz): 1: 2592 
                Graphics:  Device-1: VMware SVGA II Adapter driver: vmwgfx v: 2.12.0.0 bus ID: 00:02.0 
                           Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.4 driver: vmware unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 1920x989~60Hz 
                           OpenGL: renderer: llvmpipe (LLVM 7.0 256 bits) v: 3.3 Mesa 18.3.6 direct render: Yes 
                Audio:     Device-1: Intel 82801AA AC97 Audio driver: snd_intel8x0 v: kernel bus ID: 00:05.0 
                           Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.9.0-264-antix.1-amd64-smp 
                Network:   Device-1: Intel 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet driver: e1000 v: 7.3.21-k8-NAPI port: d020 bus ID: 00:03.0 
                           IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter> 
                           Device-2: Intel 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI type: network bridge driver: piix4_smbus v: N/A port: d200 bus ID: 00:07.0 
                Drives:    Local Storage: total: 8.00 GiB used: 4.61 GiB (57.6%) 
                           ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: VirtualBox model: VBOX HARDDISK size: 8.00 GiB 
                Partition: ID-1: / size: 7.29 GiB used: 4.25 GiB (58.4%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1 
                           ID-2: swap-1 size: 512.0 MiB used: 362.2 MiB (70.7%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2 
                Sensors:   Message: No sensors data was found. Is sensors configured? 
                Repos:     Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list 
                           1: deb http://tux.rainside.sk/mxlinux/antix/buster buster main nonfree nosystemd
                           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/buster-backports.list 
                           1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-backports main contrib non-free
                           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list 
                           1: deb http://ftp.sk.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main contrib non-free
                           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 
                           1: deb http://ftp.sk.debian.org/debian/ buster main contrib non-free
                           2: deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
                           No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/onion.list 
                           No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list 
                Info:      Processes: 151 Uptime: 21h 32m Memory: 995.3 MiB used: 730.4 MiB (73.4%) Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 Compilers: 
                           gcc: 8.3.0 Shell: bash v: 5.0.3 inxi: 3.0.36
                #60284
                Forum Admin
                anticapitalista
                  Helpful
                  Up
                  0
                  ::

                  add dev to antix repos eg

                  deb http://tux.rainside.sk/mxlinux/antix/buster buster main nonfree nosystemd dev

                  or wait until our repo-manager moves them from dev to main

                  • This reply was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by anticapitalista. Reason: extra info

                  Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

                  antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

                  #60285
                  Member
                  sybok
                    Helpful
                    Up
                    0
                    ::

                    Hi, thanks for the ‘inxi -Fxzr’ information.
                    My first guess would be the use of ‘backports’ which is said to be potentially dangerous, see this Debian-backports link.
                    Did you install some software outside of the repositories that might have some version of the affected library bundled within?
                    Apart from that, I have no idea.

                    BTW: Zdravím z ČR do SR (soudě dle ‘sk’ repozitářů).

                    Edit: Oh, I was too late and after the mighty and wise anticapitalista.

                    • This reply was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by sybok.
                    #60298
                    Member
                    bedna
                      Helpful
                      Up
                      0
                      ::

                      add dev to antix repos eg

                      deb http://tux.rainside.sk/mxlinux/antix/buster buster main nonfree nosystemd dev

                      or wait until our repo-manager moves them from dev to main

                      Thanks mate now it works very well

                      #60299
                      Member
                      bedna
                        Helpful
                        Up
                        0
                        ::

                        BTW: Zdravím z ČR do SR (soudě dle ‘sk’ repozitářů).

                        Som práve v Budapešti, ale som zo Slovenska 🙂

                        #60389
                        Member
                        sybok
                          Helpful
                          Up
                          0
                          ::

                          Please edit the post-title (should be possible up to 48[?] hours) to mark it solved.
                          E.g. ‘<orig. title>’ to ‘[SOLVED] <orig. title>’.
                          If not possible anymore, please ask a forum admin to do it for you.

                          Thanks!

                        Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
                        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.