Forum › Forums › New users › New Users and General Questions › Make old system more lightweight
Tagged: celeron, lightweight
- This topic has 30 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated Mar 4-3:01 pm by andfree.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 9, 2017 at 5:09 am #3535Member
andfree
Hi. I use a Compaq Presario 2106EA laptop with Intel Celeron. I have upgraded RAM to 512MB (it was only 256MB) and I have installed antix 16, but it’s still too slow, especially when it browses to web. Any idea how to make the system more lightweight and fast? Thanks.
December 9, 2017 at 6:12 am #3536Forum Admin
anticapitalista
::Don’t use the web with a modern browser. Nothing we can do about that. Use dillo of links2 -g
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
December 9, 2017 at 9:52 am #3539Forum Admin
rokytnji
::inxi -Fxzfrom a terminal is needed when asking questions like this. My signature link below covers this.
My IBM T23 which is Pentium 3 is not too slow. But I am not going to require it to use Firefox on a pentium 3 laptop. One must compromise using legacy gear. In 2017.
Example: https://www.antixforum.com/forums/topic/web-browsers/#post-1925
Sometimes I drive a crooked road to get my mind straight.
Not all who Wander are Lost.
I'm not outa place. I'm from outer space.Linux Registered User # 475019
How to Search for AntiX solutions to your problemsDecember 9, 2017 at 9:58 am #3540Forum Admin
rokytnji
::Also. SamK gives some good tips on this forum for older gear.
https://www.antixforum.com/forums/topic/tips-for-improving-performance-on-ancient-kit/
https://www.antixforum.com/forums/topic/zram-misconceptions-and-doubts/
Sometimes I drive a crooked road to get my mind straight.
Not all who Wander are Lost.
I'm not outa place. I'm from outer space.Linux Registered User # 475019
How to Search for AntiX solutions to your problemsDecember 9, 2017 at 11:30 am #3543Forum Admin
dolphin_oracle
::dillo in combination with streamlight (included on antiX full) for youtube videos isn’t a bad combo.
December 9, 2017 at 11:50 am #3547Member
fatmac
::Modern web browsers are the main problem for older hardware, they just eat up the ram – maybe try chromium – it is, I think, what is run on Raspberian, the Debian based distro used with the Raspberry Pi, an ARM processor with 1 GB ram – it’s just about usable on that micro computer.
(Only have one or two tabs open, any more & it’ll slow right down.)
Linux (& BSD) since 1999
December 9, 2017 at 11:53 am #3548Forum Admin
rokytnji
::they just eat up the ram
and cpu. Trust me on this. CPU over usage is worse than ram usage.
Sometimes I drive a crooked road to get my mind straight.
Not all who Wander are Lost.
I'm not outa place. I'm from outer space.Linux Registered User # 475019
How to Search for AntiX solutions to your problemsDecember 9, 2017 at 1:31 pm #3555Anonymous
::Any idea how to make the system more lightweight and fast?
regardless which web browser :
1) choose a “window manager only” desktop session (not xyz+rox, nor xyz+spacefm)
2) remove non-essential session autostarted items (conky, clipboard manager, trayicon accessory widgets)
3) run “sudo sysv-rc-conf” and disable autostart of unneeded services
4) man sysctl and read about vm.swappiness, and verify it is set to a low value (5%)After performing 1-4, by using “htop” you might find another couple non-essential processes still contributing to the baseline memory usage footprint,
but probably none which are significant. Make a note of the baseline amount of RAM used/free.When testing/comparing various browsers, to verify the current baseline prior to browser launch, first login to a console and launch htop.
After launching the browser (use same/known homepage, across all browsers tested), note the “free” reported by htop.
When configuring settings for a web browser, if you can manually specify (limit) its cache size, choose a value smaller than the known “free” available on your system. Doing so will (hopefully) avoid performance-killing swapfile use.If using firefox:
visit “Options” and select “never load” for Flash; for any other installed plugins, choose “always ask” (or “never load”).
visit “about:config” and specify browser.cache.disk.enable=false
(other tweaks to various browser.cache.* prefkeys may provide additional, but minimal, benefit. YMMV. Websearch to learn more)
-=-
Beyond these quickie steps, there’s PLENTY to be gained by using adblocking (general goal: disallow loading of content form 3rd-party sites) browser extentions, and by tweaking browser preferences. The “user.js” (hosted on github and) mentioned at the “ghacks.net” website is a good reference. Don’t blindly “paste” the full content of the user.js ~~ read the inline comments and decide which preferences can/should be changed to suit your browsing habits/destinations.December 9, 2017 at 5:23 pm #3557Forum Admin
Dave
::regardless which web browser :
1) choose a “window manager only” desktop session (not xyz+rox, nor xyz+spacefm)
2) remove non-essential session autostarted items (conky, clipboard manager, trayicon accessory widgets)This should be what the min-WM options do.
Computers are like air conditioners. They work fine until you start opening Windows. ~Author Unknown
December 10, 2017 at 12:45 am #3562Memberandfree
::Many thanks to all of you for the plenty of answers. Dillo is very much faster, but it’s not for all uses (Google Maps, for example). Chromium seems to be a nice alternative. I’ ll test more of your advice.
$ inxi -Fxz System: Host: antix1 Kernel: 4.4.10-antix.1-486-smp i686 bits: 32 gcc: 4.9.3 Desktop: IceWM 1.3.8 Distro: antiX-16_386-full Berta Cáceres 26 June 2016 Machine: Device: laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: Presario 2100 v: KE.M1.54 serial: N/A Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 002A v: NS570 Version PQ1A74 serial: N/A BIOS: Phoenix v: KE.M1.54 date: 12/17/20022 CPU: Single core Mobile Intel Celeron (-UP-) arch: Netburst Willamette rev.7 cache: 256 KB flags: (pae sse sse2) bmips: 3190 speed: 1595 MHz (max) Graphics: Card: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] RS200M [Radeon IGP 330M/340M/345M/350M] bus-ID: 01:05.0 Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: ati,radeon (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa) Resolution: 1024x768@60.00hz OpenGL: renderer: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 3.5, 128 bits) version: 3.0 Mesa 10.3.2 Direct Render: Yes Audio: Card ULi M5451 PCI AC-Link Controller Audio Device driver: snd_ali5451 port: 1000 bus-ID: 00:06.0 Sound: ALSA v: k4.4.10-antix.1-486-smp Network: Card-1: National DP83815 (MacPhyter) Ethernet Controller driver: natsemi port: 2400 bus-ID: 00:12.0 IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter> Card-2: Atheros TP-Link TL-WN821N v2 802.11n [Atheros AR9170] driver: carl9170 usb-ID: 001-002 IF: wlan0 state: N/A mac: N/A Drives: HDD Total Size: 60.0GB (39.4% used) ID-1: /dev/sda model: TOSHIBA_MK6025GA size: 60.0GB Partition: ID-1: / size: 53G used: 21G (41%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1 ID-2: swap-1 size: 2.18GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2 Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 45.0C mobo: N/A Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A Info: Processes: 135 Uptime: 21 min Memory: 113.8/433.0MB Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 4.9.2 Client: Shell (bash 4.3.301) inxi: 2.3.43December 10, 2017 at 12:32 pm #3568Member
cyrilus31
::I agree with Roky. CPU is the main issue with modern browser if you have at least 512 Mo of ram.
My pentium 4 often reaches 100% in firefox but ram use is about 300 Mo with 4 tabs open.December 12, 2017 at 11:58 pm #3698Memberandfree
::Qupzilla seems to be quite fast, but still I can’t say if it’s faster than Chromium. But I have a question. In metapackage-installer (“Browsers”) there is Qupzilla with the discription “Latest Qupzilla lightweight browser” and there is also Firefox_latest with exactly the same discription (“Latest Qupzilla lightweight browser”). Why? Anyway, I installed Qupzilla and not Firefox_latest.
- This reply was modified 5 years, 4 months ago by andfree.
December 13, 2017 at 2:18 am #3700Anonymous
::Why?
C’mon, pretty obvious that it’s just a copy/paste typo.
To help the issue receive attention, could split this into a new topic… but I’m unsure what’s the attention-getting subforum for “bug reports”December 31, 2017 at 2:46 am #4519Memberandfree
::4) man sysctl and read about vm.swappiness, and verify it is set to a low value (5%)
I ran “man sysctl” and I also pressed “h” for help, but I found nothing about vm.swappiness. I copied all the displayed contents to the attachment.
EDIT: I can’t upload the attachment, so I paste its contents here:
SYSCTL(8) System Administration SYSCTL(8) NAME sysctl - configure kernel parameters at runtime SYNOPSIS sysctl [options] [variable[=value]] [...] sysctl -p [file or regexp] [...]{ SNIP}
(posting the entire content of the manpage here is pointless, and would pollute future search results).
.
SKIDOO WAS INVITING YOU, COACHING YOU, TO ______READ______ THE MANPAGE- This reply was modified 5 years, 4 months ago by andfree.
- This reply was modified 5 years, 4 months ago by andfree.
December 31, 2017 at 8:41 am #4532ModeratorBobC
::The epiphany browser takes a lot less memory than firefox, and it might be able to do the things dillo can’t handle. Chromium was another memory hog if I remember right. I agree dillo is light and quick.
As skidoo suggested, I try to run all of what are normally active tray icon programs (like the volumeicon or wicd) instead as programs that I run when I want to from toolbar buttons (like alsamixer or wpa_gui), saving memory and cpu cycles.
I do run conky, but I increase the time interval so it only runs once every 5 or 10 seconds on my slower machines, and any tasks it has to run externally, I only run once every few minutes.
The nice thing about having a very low resources machine is that if you tweak everything to run well on it, when you get a faster machine running that same code it will just FLY!
- This reply was modified 5 years, 4 months ago by BobC.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.