- This topic has 16 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated Dec 3-8:52 am by caprea.
-
Posts
-
Xaver
There are new versions of elogind, libelogind0 and libpam-elogind in the debian-sid-repo – Version: 239.1+20181112+gd4a3f291e395+nosubmodule-1+debian1.
In the antiX-sid-repo there still is version 239.1-0.1.This causes conflicts with libkf5auth5, libkf5configwidgets5, libkf5kiocore5 and libpolkit-qt5-1-1.
In the consequence ‘# apt full-upgrade’ is impossible, unless you deinstall all kde related software (i.e. falkon, k3b, kexi, tellico). ‘#apt upgrade’ is still working.
anticapitalista
What causes the conflict – the antiX version (which should get overwritten, it did on my sid install without issue) or the newer debian sid one?
If it is the debian one, then you should really file a bug there.
Do you have any packages on hold?
I don’t use any kde packages so maybe the problem is there.Post the outputs of the apt-get you tried and we’ll see if anyone can replicate the issue.
- This reply was modified 4 years, 5 months ago by anticapitalista.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
anticapitalista
I think the problem might be with libpolkit-qt5-1-1which wants libpam-systemd.
I’ll rebuild a nosystemd version that depends on libpam-elogind insteadPhilosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
Xaver
Yes, the conflict seems to be related to KDE packages only.
If I deinstall libkf5auth5, all my KDE packages (Falkon, k3b, Kexi, Tellico) will be deinstalled too.
Then I can run ‘#apt full-upgrade’ without problems.
But if I then want to reinstall Falkon, k3b, Kexi and Tellico, the message is ‘unmet dependencies’.
So I have reinstalled my backup, because I want to keep these programs.
There is only one package on hold: impress 0.11.1-1.1 (version 0.12.0-2 does not work properly).The output of ‘#apt update && apt list –upgradable && apt full-upgrade’:
# apt update && apt list --upgradable && apt full-upgrade Hit:1 http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/mxlinux/packages/antix/sid sid InRelease Hit:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable InRelease Hit:3 http://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/extra unstable InRelease Hit:4 http://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/fixes unstable InRelease Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 4 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them. Listing... Done elogind/unstable 239.1+20181112+gd4a3f291e395+nosubmodule-1+debian1 amd64 [upgradable from: 239.1-0.1] impressive/unstable,unstable 0.12.0-2 all [upgradable from: 0.11.1-1.1] libelogind0/unstable 239.1+20181112+gd4a3f291e395+nosubmodule-1+debian1 amd64 [upgradable from: 239.1-0.1] libpam-elogind/unstable 239.1+20181112+gd4a3f291e395+nosubmodule-1+debian1 amd64 [upgradable from: 239.1-0.1] Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Error! Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libkf5configwidgets5 : Depends: libkf5auth5 (>= 4.96.0) but it is not going to be installed libkf5kiocore5 : Depends: libkf5auth5 (>= 4.96.0) but it is not going to be installed E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.- This reply was modified 4 years, 5 months ago by Xaver.
anticapitalista
Rebult polkit-qt package just hit the repos so see if it now works. Post the output if not.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
Xaver
Unfortunately the output is still the same as posted above.
anticapitalista
Did you use the default antiX repo? The mirrors won’t have picked up the new debs yet.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
Xaver
Which one is the default antiX repo?
I have thought ist would be
deb http://nl.mxrepo.com/antix/ sid main nosystemd
but I get an error message
With ‘deb http://repo.antixlinux.com/ sid main nosystemd’ I get the same error message.# apt update Ign:1 http://nl.mxrepo.com/antix sid InRelease Hit:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable InRelease Err:3 http://nl.mxrepo.com/antix sid Release 404 Not Found [IP: 81.4.106.127 80] Hit:4 http://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/extra unstable InRelease Hit:5 http://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/fixes unstable InRelease Reading package lists... Done E: The repository 'http://nl.mxrepo.com/antix sid Release' does not have a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.- This reply was modified 4 years, 5 months ago by Xaver.
anticapitalista
Default repo is
deb http://repo.antixlinux.com/sid sid main nosystemd nonfree
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
Xaver
Still cannot update, because the release file of the antiX sid repo is missing.
Ign:4 http://repo.antixlinux.com sid InRelease Err:5 http://repo.antixlinux.com sid Release 404 Not Found [IP: 72.143.17.194 80] Reading package lists... Done E: The repository 'http://repo.antixlinux.com sid Release' does not have a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.anticapitalista
It’s ok here.
`agu
Hit:1 http://debian.otenet.gr/debian unstable InRelease
Hit:2 http://repo.antixlinux.com/sid sid InRelease
Reading package lists… Done `Anyhow, try your original repo since the debs have now populated there.
http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/mxlinux/packages/antix/sid/pool/nosystemd/p/polkit-qt-1/
- This reply was modified 4 years, 5 months ago by anticapitalista.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
Xaver
Sorry, but at the moment none of the repos is working for me.
antix-archive-keyring (2017.3.14) is installed and seems to be ok.
So I just wait and shall try again tomorrow.
Thank you – have a good night.Xaver
There are still problems with the antiX sid repo:
Err:4 http://repo.antixlinux.com sid InRelease Could not connect to repo.antixlinux.com:80 (72.143.17.194), connection timed out Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 17 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them. W: Failed to fetch http://repo.antixlinux.com/dists/sid/InRelease Could not connect to repo.antixlinux.com:80 (72.143.17.194), connection timed out W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.The mirrors still do not have a release file:
Ign:4 https://ftp.fau.de/mxlinux-packages/antix sid InRelease Err:5 https://ftp.fau.de/mxlinux-packages/antix sid Release 404 Not Found [IP: 131.188.12.211 443] Reading package lists... Done E: The repository 'https://ftp.fau.de/mxlinux-packages/antix sid Release' does not have a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
caprea
Works here
deb http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/mxlinux/packages/antix/sid/ sid nonfree nosystemd mainXaver
@ caprea
Thank you. Now my problem is clear.
I have been using the repo-manager to switch repos.
The repo-manager created
deb http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/mxlinux/packages/antix/ sid main nosystemd
Your repo line is different and it is working
deb http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/mxlinux/packages/antix/sid/ sid nonfree nosystemd mainSo repo-manager is not working properly.
Also there seems to be something wrong with the line of the default repo
deb http://repo.antixlinux.com/sid sid main nosystemd nonfree
It still does not work.The rebuild of polkit-qt package did help.
‘#apt full-upgrade’ is working again without problems.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
