regarding the release model

Forum Forums New users New Users and General Questions regarding the release model

Tagged: 

  • This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated Aug 16-7:29 pm by zausel76.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #25790
    Member
    zausel76

      Hi!
      I consider replacing my Antergos istallation on my notebook with AntiX. On DistroWatch it says AntiX’ release model was “Fixed, Semi, Rolling”. I don’t understand that. i would appeciate, if someone could provide a link to a resource, where i can read on that topic.

      (Antergos is/was a rolling release model and it frequently consumed the internet traffic volume of my smartphone (via hotspot) for updates. i also know debian’s fixed release model, as i use debian stretch on my desktop computer. So a rolling release model on a debian distro sounds mildly strange to me. What a “semi” release cycle is, i could only guess..)

      Thanks & we will probably meet again.

      #25796
      Forum Admin
      dolphin_oracle
        Helpful
        Up
        0
        ::

        basically antiX supports a couple of ways of operating.

        1. stable debian repos, which will give you a good base with security updates and such.

        2. run with the testing repos, which gives you a rolling type release, although despite what people tell you testing does occasionally have issues with updates, so check the forum and what your apt-get dist-upgrade is telling you before committing.

        3. you can run with sid too, but expect breakage.

        #25805
        Member
        manyroads
          Helpful
          Up
          0
          ::

          @d_o is there anything much beyond these words on setting things up to use debian testing/ unstable repos?

          If you wish you can enable the Debian testing or unstable repositories and live on the bleeding-edge! For those that prefer stability, keep to the Debian Stable/stretch repositories.

          Pax vobiscum,
          Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
          "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
          dwm & i3wm ~Reg. Linux User #449130
          20 Jan 2021 ~ "End of an Error"

          #25808
          Forum Admin
          dolphin_oracle
            Helpful
            Up
            0
            ::

            yeah, on unstable/sid, it will break someday, particularly if you do updates without reading what’s going to happen!

            #25810
            Moderator
            Brian Masinick
              Helpful
              Up
              0
              ::

              basically antiX supports a couple of ways of operating.

              1. stable debian repos, which will give you a good base with security updates and such.

              2. run with the testing repos, which gives you a rolling type release, although despite what people tell you testing does occasionally have issues with updates, so check the forum and what your apt-get dist-upgrade is telling you before committing.

              3. you can run with sid too, but expect breakage.

              Thanks Dolphin Oracle. You are right on with these comments.
              Based on between 20-25 years using Debian-based software, about 30 years using Linux software, and over 40 years using UNIX-based systems, I can tell you this:

              1. Debian Stable is very stable, better than any commercial software, also equal to or superior to other Linux and UNIX systems in overall stability.

              2. Debian Testing is generally solid; in my experience the majority of any instability comes near Debian release boundaries or any time there are a large number of software changes that are not quite up to the usual high standard of testing that Debian Testing usually enjoys.

              3. Debian Unstable, also known as Sid after the “unstable” boy from “Toy Story” is generally great software. Like Testing, you have to be extremely careful with it when there are a large number of changes, particularly near a major Debian release. You should always look out for broken dependencies, and it’s a good idea to locate a forum where Debian software changes are discussed, or look through the software changes, if you are familiar with reading software.

              I’ve had good success with all three, including Sid. I’ve also deliberately tried to break systems at times. If you want to break a system and see if you can either “fix it” or rebuild it, try updating Sid carelessly right after a major Debian release. It’s only a BAD idea if you don’t have good backups or a good way to recover, or time to install a new system; otherwise breaking and fixing systems (or reinstalling them) is a GREAT way to learn – as long as you are not destroying critical information without a proper way to recreate, rebuild, or restore it. Just make sure you have a way to save and restore anything that is important so you do not destroy it without a means of recovering from a rebuild.

              --
              Brian Masinick

              #25825
              Member
              zausel76
                Helpful
                Up
                0
                ::

                Oh, i see. It is all about the repos. I feel a bit foolish now, but somehow the obvious did not occur to me.
                I will probably stay with stable, though “testing” now has become instantly interesting.

                Thanks for your replies!

              Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.