runit on testing error: antiX Updater tries to remove init & runit

Forum Forums Official Releases antiX-19 “Marielle Franco, Hannie Schaft, Manolis Glezos, Grup Yorum” runit on testing error: antiX Updater tries to remove init & runit

  • This topic has 23 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated Mar 1-2:03 pm by Koo.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #55100
    Member
    LarryDC

    “…WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
    This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
    init
    runit-init (due to init)
    20 upgraded, 7 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
    Need to get 26.9 MB of archives.
    After this operation, 7,941 kB of additional disk space will be used.
    You are about to do something potentially harmful.
    To continue type in the phrase ‘Yes, do as I say!'”

    To which, I of course type ‘n’

    anticapitalista’s sig contains: “antiX with runit – leaner and meaner.”
    I agree. Perhaps the ‘AntiX Updater’ script for runit should be changed from “apt” to “apt-get”?

    What does work is: sudo apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
    apt does NOT work.
    And as instructed:

    $ inxi -Fxz
    System:
      Kernel: 4.19.152-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 10.2.1 
      Desktop: JWM 2.4.0 Distro: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid 
      base: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid 
    Machine:
      Type: Desktop Mobo: ASUSTeK model: P8B75-V v: Rev X.0x serial: <filter> 
      BIOS: American Megatrends v: 1601 date: 09/19/2013 
    CPU:
      Info: Quad Core model: Intel Core i5-3350P bits: 64 type: MCP 
      arch: Ivy Bridge rev: 9 L2 cache: 6 MiB 
      flags: avx lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx bogomips: 24739 
      Speed: 3186 MHz min/max: 1600/3300 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 3186 2: 3218 
      3: 3186 4: 3140 
    Graphics:
      Device-1: NVIDIA GT218 [GeForce 210] vendor: eVga.com. driver: nvidia 
      v: 340.108 bus ID: 01:00.0 
      Display: server: X.Org 1.20.10 driver: loaded: nvidia 
      resolution: 1920x1080~75Hz 
      OpenGL: renderer: GeForce 210/PCIe/SSE2 v: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 340.108 
      direct render: Yes 
    Audio:
      Device-1: Intel 7 Series/C216 Family High Definition Audio 
      vendor: ASUSTeK P8Z77-V LX driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 00:1b.0 
      Device-2: NVIDIA High Definition Audio vendor: eVga.com. 
      driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 01:00.1 
      Device-3: Microsoft LifeCam Cinema type: USB 
      driver: snd-usb-audio,uvcvideo bus ID: 1-1.5:3 
      Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.19.152-antix.1-amd64-smp 
    Network:
      Device-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet 
      vendor: ASUSTeK P8 series driver: r8169 v: kernel port: d000 
      bus ID: 03:00.0 
      IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter> 
    Drives:
      Local Storage: total: 1.35 TiB used: 270.38 GiB (19.6%) 
      ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Western Digital model: WD1002FAEX-00Z3A0 
      size: 931.51 GiB 
      ID-2: /dev/sdb vendor: Western Digital model: WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 
      size: 298.09 GiB 
      ID-3: /dev/sdc vendor: Western Digital model: WD1600JB-00GVA0 
      size: 149.05 GiB 
    Partition:
      ID-1: / size: 14.34 GiB used: 9.41 GiB (65.6%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/dm-0 
      mapped: rootfs 
      ID-2: /boot size: 9.55 GiB used: 4.68 GiB (49.1%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sdb7 
      ID-3: /opt size: 38.2 GiB used: 11.23 GiB (29.4%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda10 
    Swap:
      Alert: No Swap data was found. 
    Sensors:
      System Temperatures: cpu: 29.8 C mobo: 27.8 C gpu: nvidia temp: 39 C 
      Fan Speeds (RPM): cpu: 0 
    Info:
      Processes: 232 Uptime: 6h 13m Memory: 7.72 GiB used: 1016.6 MiB (12.9%) 
      Init: runit runlevel: 2 Compilers: gcc: 10.2.1 Packages: 1960 Shell: Bash 
      v: 5.1.4 inxi: 3.3.01 

    Great distro… My main boot of the 25 bootable on my 3 HDs.
    Of course I relish its finely tuned jwm wm which is the only one I use now.

    "ουκ εν τω πολλώ το ευ" Aristotle
    i5 8GB RAM, 3 HDs mainly JWM.
    Linux User #305687 (Antix runit, Crowz, Michaels-Duvuan, Absolute, Sparky, Endeavouros)
    Pawtucket RI EE.UU.

    #55143
    Forum Admin
    anticapitalista
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    Inxi shows you are using bullseye/sid.
    Is it bullseye or sid?
    Did you upgrade from buster?

    I don’t see the warning on my buster/based runit, nor my bullseye alpha (converted to runit) install

    Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

    antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

    #55151
    Member
    Murdock2525
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    inxi -b will show bullseye only

    #55152
    Member
    LarryDC
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    Sorry Murdock2525, it does not show only bullseye.
    to anticapitalista: “Is it bullseye or sid? Did you upgrade from buster?”

    What I installed was: antiX-19.3-runit_x64-full.iso
    And as can be seen from my repositories I did change to testing NOT sid:

    $ inxi -br
    System:
      Host: i5 Kernel: 4.19.152-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 
      Desktop: JWM 2.4.0 Distro: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid 
    Machine:
      Type: Desktop Mobo: ASUSTeK model: P8B75-V v: Rev X.0x 
      serial: <superuser required> BIOS: American Megatrends v: 1601 
      date: 09/19/2013 
    CPU:
      Info: Quad Core Intel Core i5-3350P [MCP] speed: 1596 MHz 
      min/max: 1600/3300 MHz 
    Graphics:
      Device-1: NVIDIA GT218 [GeForce 210] driver: nvidia v: 340.108 
      Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.10 driver: loaded: nvidia 
      resolution: 1920x1080~75Hz 
      OpenGL: renderer: GeForce 210/PCIe/SSE2 v: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 340.108 
    Network:
      Device-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet 
      driver: r8169 
    Drives:
      Local Storage: total: 1.35 TiB used: 270.42 GiB (19.6%) 
    Repos:
      Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list 
      1: deb http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/testing testing main nonfree nosystemd
      Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/buster-backports.list 
      1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-backports main contrib non-free
      Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 
      1: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
      2: deb http://security.debian.org testing-security main contrib non-free
      No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/onion.list 
      No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list 
    Info:
      Processes: 234 Uptime: 5m Memory: 7.72 GiB used: 907.7 MiB (11.5%) 
      Shell: Bash inxi: 3.3.01 

    Perhaps the whole antix Updater listing will help?

    
    The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
       getty-run (2.1.2-40.0antix1)
       libldb2 (2:2.2.0-3+b1)
       libreadline5 (5.2+dfsg-3+b13)
       libsmbclient (2:4.13.4+dfsg-1)
       python3-ldb (2:2.2.0-3+b1)
       python3-talloc (2.3.1-2+b1)
       samba-libs (2:4.13.4+dfsg-1)
    Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
    The following packages will be REMOVED:
       init (1.60)
       runit-init (2.1.2-40.0antix1)
    The following NEW packages will be installed:
       libinih1 (53-1+b1)
       libmd0 (1.0.3-3)
       libmd0:i386 (1.0.3-3)
       libmpdec3 (2.5.1-1)
       libopus0:i386 (1.3.1-0.1)
       libplacebo72 (2.72.2-1)
       system-keyboard-qt (21.02.01+antix2)
    The following packages will be upgraded:
       antix-installer (1.3.5 => 1.4.1)
       cdparanoia (3.10.2+debian-13+b1 => 3.10.2+debian-13.1)
       gir1.2-vte-2.91 (0.62.2-1 => 0.62.3-1)
       git (1:2.30.0-1 => 1:2.30.1-1)
       git-man (1:2.30.0-1 => 1:2.30.1-1)
       intel-microcode (3.20201118.1 => 3.20210216.1)
       libbsd0 (0.10.0-1 => 0.11.3-1)
       libbsd0:i386 (0.10.0-1 => 0.11.3-1)
       libcdparanoia0 (3.10.2+debian-13+b1 => 3.10.2+debian-13.1)
       libcmis-0.5-5v5 (0.5.2-2+b2 => 0.5.2-3)
       libdns-export1110 (1:9.11.19+dfsg-1 => 1:9.11.19+dfsg-2)
       libisc-export1105 (1:9.11.19+dfsg-1 => 1:9.11.19+dfsg-2)
       libjson-glib-1.0-0 (1.6.0-3 => 1.6.2-1)
       libjson-glib-1.0-common (1.6.0-3 => 1.6.2-1)
       libmpv1 (0.32.0-2+b1 => 0.32.0-2.0antix1)
       libpcsclite1 (1.9.0-1 => 1.9.1-1)
       libpython3.9 (3.9.1-2 => 3.9.1-4)
       libpython3.9-minimal (3.9.1-2 => 3.9.1-4)
       libpython3.9-stdlib (3.9.1-2 => 3.9.1-4)
       libsdl1.2debian (1.2.15+dfsg2-5 => 1.2.15+dfsg2-6)
       libsndfile1 (1.0.28-8 => 1.0.31-1)
       libsndfile1:i386 (1.0.28-8 => 1.0.31-1)
       libvte-2.91-0 (0.62.2-1 => 0.62.3-1)
       libvte-2.91-common (0.62.2-1 => 0.62.3-1)
       nano (5.5-1.0antix1 => 5.6-1.0antix1)
       python3.9 (3.9.1-2 => 3.9.1-4)
       python3.9-minimal (3.9.1-2 => 3.9.1-4)
       tar (1.32+dfsg-1 => 1.34+dfsg-1)
       xfsprogs (5.6.0-1+b2 => 5.10.0-4)
       xserver-common (2:1.20.10-2 => 2:1.20.10-3)
       xserver-xorg-core (2:1.20.10-2 => 2:1.20.10-3)
       xserver-xorg-input-elographics (1:1.4.1-2+b1 => 1:1.4.2-1)
       xserver-xorg-video-mach64 (6.9.6-2+b1 => 6.9.6-3)
    WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
    This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
       init
       runit-init (due to init)
    33 upgraded, 7 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
    Need to get 32.0 MB of archives.
    After this operation, 7,933 kB of additional disk space will be used.
    You are about to do something potentially harmful.
    To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'

    "ουκ εν τω πολλώ το ευ" Aristotle
    i5 8GB RAM, 3 HDs mainly JWM.
    Linux User #305687 (Antix runit, Crowz, Michaels-Duvuan, Absolute, Sparky, Endeavouros)
    Pawtucket RI EE.UU.

    #55155
    Forum Admin
    anticapitalista
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    What happens if you remove the buster-backports repo?

    Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

    antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

    #55162
    Member
    LarryDC
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    What happens if you remove the buster-backports repo?

    No change. I already tried that.
    Still only apt-get upgrade will work. Nothing else.

    "ουκ εν τω πολλώ το ευ" Aristotle
    i5 8GB RAM, 3 HDs mainly JWM.
    Linux User #305687 (Antix runit, Crowz, Michaels-Duvuan, Absolute, Sparky, Endeavouros)
    Pawtucket RI EE.UU.

    #55163
    Forum Admin
    anticapitalista
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    after apt-get upgrade? What does apt dist-upgrade show?

    Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

    antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

    #55164
    Member
    LarryDC
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    Thanks for looking into it.

    But I really like your distro and it is my main one. I wad just uncomfortable only using “upgrade” on testing.
    I used AptoSid and now Siduction for years but always “dist-upgrade”.

    Should I just switch the repositories to sid and see if that solves it?

    "ουκ εν τω πολλώ το ευ" Aristotle
    i5 8GB RAM, 3 HDs mainly JWM.
    Linux User #305687 (Antix runit, Crowz, Michaels-Duvuan, Absolute, Sparky, Endeavouros)
    Pawtucket RI EE.UU.

    #55165
    Forum Admin
    anticapitalista
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    It seems weird since there isn’t anything in the upgrade that should remove init and runit-init.

    Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

    antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

    #55169
    Member
    LarryDC
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    after apt-get upgrade? What does apt dist-upgrade show?

    Here it is:

    apt-get dist-upgrade
    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree... Done
    Reading state information... Done
    Calculating upgrade... Done
    The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
      getty-run libldb2 libreadline5 libsmbclient python3-ldb python3-talloc
      samba-libs
    Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them.
    The following packages will be REMOVED:
      init runit-init
    The following NEW packages will be installed:
      libinih1 libmd0 libmd0:i386 libmpdec3 libopus0:i386 libplacebo72
    The following packages will be upgraded:
      libbsd0 libbsd0:i386 libmpv1 libpython3.9 libpython3.9-minimal
      libpython3.9-stdlib libsndfile1 libsndfile1:i386 python3.9 python3.9-minimal
      xfsprogs
    WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
    This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
      init runit-init (due to init)
    11 upgraded, 6 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
    Need to get 11.2 MB of archives.
    After this operation, 7,484 kB of additional disk space will be used.
    You are about to do something potentially harmful.
    To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'

    "ουκ εν τω πολλώ το ευ" Aristotle
    i5 8GB RAM, 3 HDs mainly JWM.
    Linux User #305687 (Antix runit, Crowz, Michaels-Duvuan, Absolute, Sparky, Endeavouros)
    Pawtucket RI EE.UU.

    #55170
    Forum Admin
    anticapitalista
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    libbsd0:i386 and libsndfile1:i386 might be the culprits.
    Neither are in Debian testing repo.
    What are they used for?
    What happens if you purge them and then dist-upgrade?

    Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

    antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

    #55172
    Member
    LarryDC
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    OK. I just apt-get install the above packages:
    libbsd0 libbsd0:i386 libmpv1 libpython3.9 libpython3.9-minimal
    libpython3.9-stdlib libsndfile1 libsndfile1:i386 python3.9 python3.9-minimal
    xfsprogs

    Then:

    # apt autoremove
    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree... Done
    Reading state information... Done
    The following packages will be REMOVED:
      libldb2 libreadline5 libsmbclient python3-ldb python3-talloc samba-libs
    0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 6 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
    After this operation, 27.1 MB disk space will be freed.
    Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
    (Reading database ... 194102 files and directories currently installed.)
    Removing libsmbclient:amd64 (2:4.13.4+dfsg-1) ...
    Removing samba-libs:amd64 (2:4.13.4+dfsg-1) ...
    Removing python3-ldb (2:2.2.0-3+b1) ...
    Removing libldb2:amd64 (2:2.2.0-3+b1) ...
    Removing libreadline5:amd64 (5.2+dfsg-3+b13) ...
    Removing python3-talloc:amd64 (2.3.1-2+b1) ...
    Processing triggers for man-db (2.9.4-1) ...
    Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.31-9) ...

    Now this is what apt says is the problem:`
    # apt upgrade
    Reading package lists… Done
    Building dependency tree… Done
    Reading state information… Done
    Calculating upgrade… Done
    Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
    requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
    distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
    or been moved out of Incoming.
    The following information may help to resolve the situation:

    The following packages have unmet dependencies:
    elogind : Conflicts: systemd
    Conflicts: systemd:i386
    eudev : Breaks: systemd (> 220)
    Breaks: systemd:i386 (> 220)
    libelogind0 : Conflicts: libsystemd0
    libelogind0:i386 : Conflicts: libsystemd0
    runit-init : Conflicts: systemd-sysv
    Conflicts: systemd-sysv:i386
    E: Broken packages`

    But apt-get upgrade is happy:`
    # apt-get upgrade
    Reading package lists… Done
    Building dependency tree… Done
    Reading state information… Done
    Calculating upgrade… Done
    The following packages have been kept back:
    init
    0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.`

    While apt dist-upgrade still complains:

    
    # apt dist-upgrade
    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree... Done
    Reading state information... Done
    Calculating upgrade... Done
    The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
      getty-run
    Use 'apt autoremove' to remove it.
    The following packages will be REMOVED:
      init runit-init
    WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
    This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
      init runit-init (due to init)
    0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
    After this operation, 73.7 kB disk space will be freed.
    You are about to do something potentially harmful.
    To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'
     ?]

    "ουκ εν τω πολλώ το ευ" Aristotle
    i5 8GB RAM, 3 HDs mainly JWM.
    Linux User #305687 (Antix runit, Crowz, Michaels-Duvuan, Absolute, Sparky, Endeavouros)
    Pawtucket RI EE.UU.

    #55175
    Forum Admin
    anticapitalista
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    Try removing them rather than upgrading them

    Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

    antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.

    #55180
    Member
    Dzhigit
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    Could the problem be init now depends on systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core instead of systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | runit-init

    • This reply was modified 3 months, 3 weeks ago by Dzhigit.
    #55184
    Member
    LarryDC
    Helpful
    Up
    0
    :D

    libbsd0:i386 and libsndfile1:i386 might be the culprits.
    Neither are in Debian testing repo.
    What are they used for?
    What happens if you purge them and then dist-upgrade?

    Well I apt-get removed them. Sorry, I kow you said purge.
    I believe they came in with wine. But I own Crossover Office so I don’t care about wine.

    But still no joy:

    
    # apt-get dist-upgrade
    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree... Done
    Reading state information... Done
    Calculating upgrade... Done
    The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
      getty-run
    Use 'apt autoremove' to remove it.
    The following packages will be REMOVED:
      init runit-init
    WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
    This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
      init runit-init (due to init)
    0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
    After this operation, 73.7 kB disk space will be freed.
    You are about to do something potentially harmful.
    To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'
     ?]

    "ουκ εν τω πολλώ το ευ" Aristotle
    i5 8GB RAM, 3 HDs mainly JWM.
    Linux User #305687 (Antix runit, Crowz, Michaels-Duvuan, Absolute, Sparky, Endeavouros)
    Pawtucket RI EE.UU.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.