- This topic has 62 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated Apr 16-8:00 am by Fonsis.
-
Posts
-
anticapitalista
Re-read my edited post
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
caprea
How did you solve , is not solved ?
- This reply was modified 5 years, 2 months ago by caprea.
- This reply was modified 5 years, 2 months ago by caprea.
sleekmason
Okay, installed the new broadcom-sta-dkms
reinstalled kernel and headers, Same problem. ran reconfigure again and the problem still exists.error in terminal is:
Building initial module for 4.14.14-antix.1-amd64-smp Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 4.14.14-antix.1-amd64-smp (x86_64) Consult /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/make.log for more information.The error in make.log:
DKMS make.log for broadcom-sta-6.30.223.271 for kernel 4.14.14-antix.1-amd64-smp (x86_64) Wed Feb 14 16:26:33 CST 2018 /bin/sh: 1: [: Illegal number: /bin/sh: 1: [: Illegal number: Wireless Extension is the only possible API for this kernel version Using Wireless Extension API KBUILD_NOPEDANTIC=1 make -C /lib/modules/4.14.14-antix.1-amd64-smp/build M=<code>pwd</code> make[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add '+' to parent make rule. make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.14.14-antix.1-amd64-smp' CFG80211 API is prefered for this kernel version Using CFG80211 API Kernel architecture is X86_64 AR /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/built-in.o CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/shared/linux_osl.o /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/shared/linux_osl.c: In function ‘osl_os_get_image_block’: /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/shared/linux_osl.c:1083:26: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘kernel_read’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] rdlen = kernel_read(fp, fp->f_pos, buf, len); ^~ In file included from ./include/linux/huge_mm.h:7:0, from ./include/linux/mm.h:453, from /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/include/linuxver.h:65, from /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/shared/linux_osl.c:25: ./include/linux/fs.h:2823:16: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of type ‘loff_t {aka long long int}’ extern ssize_t kernel_read(struct file *, void *, size_t, loff_t *); ^~~~~~~~~~~ /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/shared/linux_osl.c:1083:37: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘kernel_read’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] rdlen = kernel_read(fp, fp->f_pos, buf, len); ^~~ In file included from ./include/linux/huge_mm.h:7:0, from ./include/linux/mm.h:453, from /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/include/linuxver.h:65, from /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/shared/linux_osl.c:25: ./include/linux/fs.h:2823:16: note: expected ‘size_t {aka long unsigned int}’ but argument is of type ‘char *’ extern ssize_t kernel_read(struct file *, void *, size_t, loff_t *); ^~~~~~~~~~~ /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/shared/linux_osl.c:1083:42: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘kernel_read’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] rdlen = kernel_read(fp, fp->f_pos, buf, len); ^~~ In file included from ./include/linux/huge_mm.h:7:0, from ./include/linux/mm.h:453, from /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/include/linuxver.h:65, from /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/shared/linux_osl.c:25: ./include/linux/fs.h:2823:16: note: expected ‘loff_t * {aka long long int *}’ but argument is of type ‘int’ extern ssize_t kernel_read(struct file *, void *, size_t, loff_t *); ^~~~~~~~~~~ CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.o /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.c: In function ‘wl_pci_probe’: /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.c:774:2: warning: this ‘if’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if ((val & 0x0000ff00) != 0) ^~ /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.c:776:3: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the ‘if’ bar1_size = pci_resource_len(pdev, 2); ^~~~~~~~~ /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.c: In function ‘wl_monitor’: /var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.c:2915:10: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘last_rx’ skb->dev->last_rx = jiffies; ^~ scripts/Makefile.build:314: recipe for target '/var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.o' failed make[2]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.o] Error 1 Makefile:1518: recipe for target '_module_/var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build' failed make[1]: *** [_module_/var/lib/dkms/broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271/build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.14.14-antix.1-amd64-smp' Makefile:177: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2The module builds fine in the original kernel.
Anonymous
Hello,
Spectre/meltdown question here
If my cpu outputs “bugs : fxsave_leak sysret_ss_attrs swapgs_fence amd_e400 spectre_v1 spectre_v2”
All of these bugs is kernel 4.14.14-antix.1-686-smp-pae the right one to be using or should I
put the 4.9 patched one. I have included some of dmesg output and cpuinfo in the txt file.
It’s running antix-17-full 32 bit.sleekmason
**SOLVED for Broadcom-sta module problems. I currently am running kernel 4.14.14-antix.1-amd64-smp with no issues.
Anti had it right, just needed to go one furthur.
Install broadcom-sta-dkms from sid. Heres the link.
broadcom-sta-dkms (6.30.223.271-8)Install by navigating to your ~/Downloads folder, and then:
sudo dpkg -i broadcom-sta-dkms_6.30.223.271-8_all.debThen do:
for i in $(dpkg-query -l |grep "\-dkms" |awk '{print $2'}); do dpkg-reconfigure $i |tee -a /var/log/rebuild-dkms.log; done
If the new kernel is already installed.
Reboot.*Note, Before I tried using the package from sid, I had installed the broadcom-sta-source which dragged in some dependencies as well. If the above does not work for some reason, maybe try installing that. I don’t believe they are related.
- This reply was modified 5 years, 2 months ago by sleekmason.
- This reply was modified 5 years, 2 months ago by sleekmason.
partsman
Hi all 🙂
Just was wondering will there be an updated iso in the near future with a kernel patched for
spectre and meltdown and the latest security updates applied ?
Or since I run live on a usb should I get busy with doing this myself ? LOL ! 😉
Maybe we should even be doing like they are over at MX Linux and do monthly snapshots ?
Anyway just thinking here 🙂 Thanks to all who reply 😉Anyone can build a fast processor. The trick is to build a fast system. (Seymour Cray)
Yes, will be. (was already announced & prior to release folks are betatesting new eudev)
Yes. you can. (you can perform live-remaster, then followup by running live-kernel-replacer)
No. (don’t hold your breath hoping for snapshots)greyowl
Yes, will be. (was already announced & prior to release folks are betatesting new eudev)
Yes. you can. (you can perform live-remaster, then followup by running live-kernel-replacer)
No. (don’t hold your breath hoping for snapshots)What is your guess on how soon an updated iso (eg antiX 17.1) with a kernel patched for spectre and meltdown and with the latest security updates applied will be coming out? I’m holding off on putting antiX on another computer until the next updated version is available.
Dell Latitude D620 laptop with antiX 22 (64 bit)
anticapitalista
What is your guess on how soon an updated iso (eg antiX 17.1) with a kernel patched for spectre and meltdown and with the latest security updates applied will be coming out? I’m holding off on putting antiX on another computer until the next updated version is available.
In a couple of weeks, hopefully, maybe sooner.
Just after I built the latest kernels, gcc got updated in jessie (antiX-16) and stretch (antiX-17) to be even more secure against spectre.
So, I am building a new set of kernels that will be the most secure to date (at least for 64 bit users). These need testing of course.
Once that is done, I can then build antiX-17.1Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
Thanks for the information on the coming version 17.1.
It will be great to have a more secure system.
I sure appreciate your work on this.Dell Latitude D620 laptop with antiX 22 (64 bit)
fatmac
Thanks for the information on the coming version 17.1.
It will be great to have a more secure system.
I sure appreciate your work on this.Likewise. 🙂
(I’m upgraded with 4.15.4 on my main machine, but would love to have the newer installation media.)
Linux (& BSD) since 1999
fatmac
Just a note to mention that the kernel is now up to 4.15.5 – which should be in the new releases, (as per another thread).
Linux (& BSD) since 1999
andfree
I understand that the 4.9.75 is not patched, so I installed 4.9.87-antix.1-486-smp (32-bit) kernel to this old kit:
System: Host: antix1 Kernel: 4.9.87-antix.1-486-smp i686 bits: 32 gcc: 6.3.0 Desktop: IceWM 1.4.2 Distro: antiX-17_386-base Heather Heyer 24 October 2017 Machine: Device: laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: Presario 2100 v: KE.M1.54 serial: N/A Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 002A v: NS570 Version PQ1A74 serial: N/A BIOS: Phoenix v: KE.M1.54 date: 12/17/20022 CPU: Single core Mobile Intel Celeron (-UP-) arch: Netburst Willamette rev.7 cache: 256 KB flags: (pae sse sse2) bmips: 3190 speed: 1595 MHz (max) Graphics: Card: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] RS200M [Radeon IGP 330M/340M/345M/350M] bus-ID: 01:05.0 Display Server: X.Org 1.19.2 drivers: ati,radeon (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa) Resolution: 1024x768@60.00hz OpenGL: renderer: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 3.9, 128 bits) version: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6 Direct Render: Yes Audio: Card ULi M5451 PCI AC-Link Controller Audio Device driver: snd_ali5451 port: 1000 bus-ID: 00:06.0 Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.87-antix.1-486-smp Network: Card-1: National DP83815 (MacPhyter) Ethernet Controller driver: natsemi port: 2400 bus-ID: 00:12.0 IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter> Card-2: Atheros TP-Link TL-WN821N v2 / TL-WN822N v1 802.11n [Atheros AR9170] driver: carl9170 usb-ID: 001-003 IF: wlan0 state: N/A mac: N/A Drives: HDD Total Size: 60.0GB (30.8% used) ID-1: /dev/sda model: TOSHIBA_MK6025GA size: 60.0GB Partition: ID-1: / size: 53G used: 16G (31%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1 ID-2: swap-1 size: 2.18GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2 Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 45.0C mobo: N/A Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A Info: Processes: 126 Uptime: 10 min Memory: 99.6/487.8MB Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 6.3.0 Client: Shell (bash 4.4.121) inxi: 2.3.54The installation gave me (too) this error message:
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 4.9.87-antix.1-486-smp (i686) Consult /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox-guest/5.2.4/build/make.log for more information.Afterwards, rebuilding dkms gave exactly the same error. It had given the same error when rebuilded dkms for 4.9.75 kernel, too.
The new kernel seems to work without problems.anticapitalista
If you don’t use virtualbox or run antiX in it, you can remove these 3 packages
virtualbox-guest-dkms
virtualbox-guest-utils
virtualbox-guest-x11Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
