Speedtest – Google Chrome – download test is bad

Forum Forums Official Releases antiX-21/22 “Grup Yorum” Speedtest – Google Chrome – download test is bad

  • This topic has 30 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated Jun 19-7:52 pm by Brian Masinick.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #84006
    Member
    Wallon

      Dear All,

      When I do a speedtest with Google Chrome in antiX 21, I always have a bad result for the download test. My curve always collapses. I should have 125 mbps all the time.

      If I do the same test with the same Google Chrome version in MX Linux 19.4, my download test is very good and my curve does not collapse.

      If I do the same test with the same Google Chrome version in Windows 10, my download test is very good and my curve does not collapse.

      Why do I have a bad result with antiX 21? If you have an idea to share…

      Best regards,
      Wallon

      
      System:    Kernel: 5.10.57-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 10.2.1 
                 parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.10.57-antix.1-amd64-smp 
                 root=UUID=0641cbc3-75b5-4d72-906c-cbacdebe0892 ro quiet 
                 Desktop: IceWM 2.9.7 vt: 7 dm: N/A Distro: antiX-21_x64-full Grup Yorum 31 October 2021 
                 base: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) 
      Machine:   Type: Desktop Mobo: MSI model: H170M PRO-VDH (MS-7982) v: 1.0 serial: <filter> 
                 UEFI-[Legacy]: American Megatrends v: 2.F0 date: 06/27/2018 
      Battery:   Message: No system battery data found. Is one present? 
      Memory:    RAM: total: 15.58 GiB used: 1.13 GiB (7.2%) 
                 RAM Report: permissions: Unable to run dmidecode. Root privileges required. 
      PCI Slots: Permissions: Unable to run dmidecode. Root privileges required. 
      CPU:       Info: Quad Core model: Intel Core i5-6400 bits: 64 type: MCP arch: Skylake-S family: 6 
                 model-id: 5E (94) stepping: 3 microcode: EC cache: L2: 6 MiB bogomips: 21599 
                 Speed: 3300 MHz min/max: 800/3300 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 3300 2: 3298 3: 3303 
                 4: 3300 
                 Flags: 3dnowprefetch abm acpi adx aes aperfmperf apic arat arch_capabilities 
                 arch_perfmon art avx avx2 bmi1 bmi2 bts clflush clflushopt cmov constant_tsc cpuid 
                 cpuid_fault cx16 cx8 de ds_cpl dtes64 dtherm dts ept ept_ad erms est f16c flexpriority 
                 flush_l1d fma fpu fsgsbase fxsr ht hwp hwp_act_window hwp_epp hwp_notify ibpb ibrs ida 
                 intel_pt invpcid invpcid_single lahf_lm lm mca mce md_clear mmx monitor movbe mpx msr 
                 mtrr nonstop_tsc nopl nx pae pat pbe pcid pclmulqdq pdcm pdpe1gb pebs pge pln pni 
                 popcnt pse pse36 pti pts rdrand rdseed rdtscp rep_good sdbg sep smap smep ss ssbd sse 
                 sse2 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 stibp syscall tm tm2 tpr_shadow tsc tsc_adjust 
                 tsc_deadline_timer vme vmx vnmi vpid x2apic xgetbv1 xsave xsavec xsaveopt xsaves 
                 xtopology xtpr 
                 Vulnerabilities: Type: itlb_multihit status: KVM: VMX disabled 
                 Type: l1tf mitigation: PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes, SMT disabled 
                 Type: mds mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT disabled 
                 Type: meltdown mitigation: PTI 
                 Type: spec_store_bypass 
                 mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp 
                 Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization 
                 Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Full generic retpoline, IBPB: conditional, IBRS_FW, STIBP: 
                 disabled, RSB filling 
                 Type: srbds mitigation: Microcode 
                 Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected 
      Graphics:  Device-1: NVIDIA GM206 [GeForce GTX 960] vendor: Micro-Star MSI driver: nvidia 
                 v: 460.91.03 bus-ID: 01:00.0 chip-ID: 10de:1401 class-ID: 0300 
                 Device-2: Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920 type: USB driver: snd-usb-audio,uvcvideo 
                 bus-ID: 1-6:3 chip-ID: 046d:082d class-ID: 0102 serial: <filter> 
                 Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.11 driver: loaded: nvidia display-ID: :0.0 screens: 1 
                 Screen-1: 0 s-res: 3840x1080 s-dpi: 92 s-size: 1060x301mm (41.7x11.9") 
                 s-diag: 1102mm (43.4") 
                 Monitor-1: HDMI-0 res: 1920x1080 hz: 60 dpi: 93 size: 527x296mm (20.7x11.7") 
                 diag: 604mm (23.8") 
                 Monitor-2: DP-0 res: 1920x1080 hz: 60 dpi: 90 size: 544x303mm (21.4x11.9") 
                 diag: 623mm (24.5") 
                 OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GTX 960/PCIe/SSE2 v: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 460.91.03 
                 direct render: Yes 
      Audio:     Device-1: Intel 100 Series/C230 Series Family HD Audio vendor: Micro-Star MSI 
                 driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus-ID: 00:1f.3 chip-ID: 8086:a170 class-ID: 0403 
                 Device-2: NVIDIA GM206 High Definition Audio vendor: Micro-Star MSI 
                 driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus-ID: 01:00.1 chip-ID: 10de:0fba class-ID: 0403 
                 Device-3: Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920 type: USB driver: snd-usb-audio,uvcvideo 
                 bus-ID: 1-6:3 chip-ID: 046d:082d class-ID: 0102 serial: <filter> 
                 Sound Server-1: ALSA v: k5.10.57-antix.1-amd64-smp running: yes 
      Network:   Device-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet vendor: Micro-Star MSI 
                 driver: r8169 v: kernel port: d000 bus-ID: 02:00.0 chip-ID: 10ec:8168 class-ID: 0200 
                 IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter> 
                 IP v4: <filter> scope: global broadcast: <filter> 
                 IP v6: <filter> scope: global 
                 IP v6: <filter> type: dynamic mngtmpaddr scope: global 
                 IP v6: <filter> scope: link 
                 WAN IP: <filter> 
      Bluetooth: Message: No bluetooth data found. 
      Logical:   Message: No logical block device data found. 
      RAID:      Message: No RAID data found. 
      Drives:    Local Storage: total: 1.38 TiB used: 34.9 GiB (2.5%) 
                 SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required. 
                 ID-1: /dev/sda maj-min: 8:0 vendor: Kingston model: SUV400S37240G size: 223.57 GiB 
                 block-size: physical: 4096 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter> 
                 rev: D6SD scheme: GPT 
                 ID-2: /dev/sdb maj-min: 8:16 vendor: Seagate model: ST1000DM003-1SB102 size: 931.51 GiB 
                 block-size: physical: 4096 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: HDD rpm: 7200 
                 serial: <filter> rev: CC43 scheme: GPT 
                 ID-3: /dev/sdc maj-min: 8:32 type: USB vendor: SanDisk model: SD9SN8W256G 
                 size: 232.89 GiB block-size: physical: 4096 B logical: 512 B type: SSD serial: <filter> 
                 rev: 1012 scheme: MBR 
                 SMART Message: Unknown USB bridge. Flash drive/Unsupported enclosure? 
                 ID-4: /dev/sdd maj-min: 8:48 type: USB vendor: SanDisk model: USB 3.2Gen1 
                 size: 28.65 GiB block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B type: N/A serial: <filter> 
                 rev: 1.00 scheme: MBR 
                 SMART Message: Unknown USB bridge. Flash drive/Unsupported enclosure? 
                 Optical-1: /dev/sr0 vendor: HL-DT-ST model: DVDRAM GH24NSD1 rev: LG00 
                 dev-links: cdrom,cdrw,dvd,dvdrw 
                 Features: speed: 12 multisession: yes audio: yes dvd: yes rw: cd-r,cd-rw,dvd-r,dvd-ram 
                 state: running 
      Partition: ID-1: / raw-size: 23.65 GiB size: 23.28 GiB (98.43%) used: 6.29 GiB (27.0%) fs: ext2 
                 dev: /dev/sdd2 maj-min: 8:50 label: rootantiX21 
                 uuid: 0641cbc3-75b5-4d72-906c-cbacdebe0892 
                 ID-2: /media/wallon/DataLinux raw-size: 188.88 GiB size: 188.88 GiB (100.00%) 
                 used: 19.34 GiB (10.2%) fs: ntfs dev: /dev/sdc3 maj-min: 8:35 label: DataLinux 
                 uuid: 45E6718D5B4AA9FF 
                 ID-3: /media/wallon/rootMX raw-size: 40 GiB size: 39.12 GiB (97.81%) 
                 used: 9.26 GiB (23.7%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sdc2 maj-min: 8:34 label: rootMX 
                 uuid: 5f41a82a-ff58-42e6-ba79-7852d0c687a0 
                 ID-4: /media/wallon/sdd3-usb-USB_SanDisk_3.2G raw-size: 4 GiB size: 3.99 GiB (99.80%) 
                 used: 32 KiB (0.0%) fs: vfat dev: /dev/sdd3 maj-min: 8:51 label: N/A uuid: 0F0F-1710 
      Swap:      Kernel: swappiness: 10 (default 60) cache-pressure: 50 (default 100) 
                 ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 1024 MiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) priority: -2 
                 dev: /dev/sdd1 maj-min: 8:49 label: swapantiX 
                 uuid: b05d12e6-625f-4f89-98b7-8f64c92e4d87 
      Unmounted: ID-1: /dev/sda1 maj-min: 8:1 size: 450 MiB fs: ntfs label: N/A uuid: 767C9A4C7C9A0751 
                 ID-2: /dev/sda2 maj-min: 8:2 size: 99 MiB fs: vfat label: N/A uuid: CA5D-855D 
                 ID-3: /dev/sda3 maj-min: 8:3 size: 16 MiB fs: <superuser required> label: N/A uuid: N/A 
                 ID-4: /dev/sda4 maj-min: 8:4 size: 222.51 GiB fs: ntfs label: N/A 
                 uuid: 460E63F10E63D907 
                 ID-5: /dev/sda5 maj-min: 8:5 size: 521 MiB fs: ntfs label: N/A uuid: F2844E49844E1091 
                 ID-6: /dev/sdb1 maj-min: 8:17 size: 128 MiB fs: <superuser required> label: N/A 
                 uuid: N/A 
                 ID-7: /dev/sdb2 maj-min: 8:18 size: 931.39 GiB fs: ntfs label: HDD 1To 
                 uuid: 6640C99340C969FF 
                 ID-8: /dev/sdc1 maj-min: 8:33 size: 4 GiB fs: swap label: N/A 
                 uuid: 5e76f17c-ea8b-4647-929a-6f0c2fef371c 
      USB:       Hub-1: 1-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 16 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s 
                 chip-ID: 1d6b:0002 class-ID: 0900 
                 Device-1: 1-5:8 info: MGE UPS Systems UPS type: HID driver: hid-generic,usbhid 
                 interfaces: 1 rev: 1.1 speed: 1.5 Mb/s power: 20mA chip-ID: 0463:ffff class-ID: 0300 
                 serial: <filter> 
                 Device-2: 1-6:3 info: Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920 type: Video,Audio 
                 driver: snd-usb-audio,uvcvideo interfaces: 4 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s power: 500mA 
                 chip-ID: 046d:082d class-ID: 0102 serial: <filter> 
                 Device-3: 1-9:4 info: Logitech M105 Optical Mouse type: Mouse 
                 driver: hid-generic,usbhid interfaces: 1 rev: 2.0 speed: 1.5 Mb/s power: 100mA 
                 chip-ID: 046d:c077 class-ID: 0301 
                 Device-4: 1-10:5 info: Microsoft Wired Keyboard 600 (model 1576) type: Keyboard,HID 
                 driver: hid-generic,usbhid interfaces: 2 rev: 2.0 speed: 1.5 Mb/s power: 100mA 
                 chip-ID: 045e:07f8 class-ID: 0300 
                 Device-5: 1-12:6 info: Genesys Logic Multislot Card Reader/Writer type: Mass Storage 
                 driver: usb-storage interfaces: 1 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s power: 500mA 
                 chip-ID: 05e3:0716 class-ID: 0806 serial: <filter> 
                 Hub-2: 2-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 8 rev: 3.0 speed: 5 Gb/s 
                 chip-ID: 1d6b:0003 class-ID: 0900 
                 Device-1: 2-1:2 info: SanDisk Ultra Flair type: Mass Storage driver: usb-storage 
                 interfaces: 1 rev: 3.2 speed: 5 Gb/s power: 896mA chip-ID: 0781:5591 class-ID: 0806 
                 serial: <filter> 
                 Device-2: 2-4:3 info: SanDisk Extreme Portable SSD type: Mass Storage driver: uas 
                 interfaces: 1 rev: 3.1 speed: 5 Gb/s power: 896mA chip-ID: 0781:558c class-ID: 0806 
                 serial: <filter> 
      Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 44.0 C mobo: 29.8 C gpu: nvidia temp: 38 C 
                 Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A gpu: nvidia fan: 0% 
      Repos:     Packages: apt: 1752 lib: 858 
                 Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list 
                 1: deb http: //it.mxrepo.com/antix/bullseye/ bullseye main nosystemd nonfree
                 Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bullseye-backports.list 
                 1: deb http: //deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main contrib non-free
                 Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list 
                 1: deb http: //mirror.as35701.net/debian/ bullseye-updates main contrib non-free
                 Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 
                 1: deb http: //ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ bullseye main contrib non-free
                 2: deb http: //security.debian.org/ bullseye-security main contrib non-free
                 Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list 
                 1: deb [arch=amd64] https: //dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main
                 Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opera-stable.list 
                 1: deb https: //deb.opera.com/opera-stable/ stable non-free #Opera Browser (final releases)
                 No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list 
      Processes: CPU top: 5 of 185 
                 1: cpu: 4.2% command: app-select started by: python3 pid: 4973 mem: 48.4 MiB (0.3%) 
                 2: cpu: 3.4% command: chrome pid: 3609 mem: 190.6 MiB (1.1%) 
                 3: cpu: 3.3% command: chrome pid: 2855 mem: 174.7 MiB (1.0%) 
                 4: cpu: 2.8% command: google-chrome-stable pid: 2816 mem: 282.4 MiB (1.7%) 
                 5: cpu: 2.8% command: chrome pid: 3198 mem: 120.4 MiB (0.7%) 
                 Memory top: 5 of 185 
                 1: mem: 282.4 MiB (1.7%) command: google-chrome-stable pid: 2816 cpu: 2.8% 
                 2: mem: 190.6 MiB (1.1%) command: chrome pid: 3609 cpu: 3.4% 
                 3: mem: 174.7 MiB (1.0%) command: chrome pid: 2855 cpu: 3.3% 
                 4: mem: 140.6 MiB (0.8%) command: chrome pid: 2951 cpu: 0.4% 
                 5: mem: 131.8 MiB (0.8%) command: xorg pid: 2214 cpu: 0.5% 
      Info:      Processes: 185 Uptime: 11m wakeups: 1 Init: SysVinit v: 2.96 runlevel: 5 default: 5 
                 tool: service Compilers: gcc: 10.2.1 alt: 10 Client: shell wrapper v: 5.1.4-release 
                 inxi: 3.3.06 
      
      #84010
      Member
      calciumsodium
        Helpful
        Up
        0
        ::

        Hi @Wallon,
        I cannot reproduce. On my machine, google-chrome-stable in antiX21 produces a flat curve using speedtest.net to produce 44.16 mbps download and 27.0 mpbs upload. Firefox in the same anti21 system using speedtest.net also produces a flat curve with 47.38 mpbs download and 26.96 mpbs upload.

        Using windows 10 on the same machine using speedtest.net I also get a flat curve with 50.86 mpbs download and 20.17 mpbs upload.

        Perhaps it is something unique with your antiX21 setup.

        #84022
        Moderator
        Brian Masinick
          Helpful
          Up
          0
          ::

          @Wallon: I have found that any differences, other than small differences, tend to be more affected by time of day, workload on the Internet service provider network and the amount of network, rather than the choice of browser or other variables.

          The network I’m using right now is pretty consistent. I haven’t gone and produced reports, but I see no need to do so because my overall browser performance is reasonably consistent across different browser versions, different distributions, and even different hardware.

          Speed variations, while slight, are more because of heavy Web traffic or the use of really old hardware in my case.

          Otherwise I’m happy whether using Firefox, Chrome, Chromium, Opera, Seamonkey or Palemoon. A few other browsers work fine too.

          --
          Brian Masinick

          #84091
          Member
          Wallon
            Helpful
            Up
            0
            ::

            Dear All,

            I removed Google Chrome and deleted the Google directory in the hidden “.config” directory.

            I reinstalled Google Chrome without installing extensions and without synchronizing with my account. I still have the same disappointing result with antiX for downloading.

            Note, it is only with antiX that I have this problem. I never get a good download even if I am alone on the modem with cable.
            I always have a bad result in the morning, at noon or in the evening or during the night.

            I would like to understand why I have this problem with antiX and not with my Android Smartphone or Windows or MX Linux.

            Best regards,
            Wallon

            #84093
            Member
            Wallon
              Helpful
              Up
              0
              ::

              Dear All,

              I also installed Chromium version 102 under antiX 21. There is no synchronisation and no extension installed in Chromium.
              The result is not good for downloading as with Google Chrome. You can see the curve that drops very steeply during the test on the screenshot.

              Best regards,
              Wallon

              #84095
              Member
              calciumsodium
                Helpful
                Up
                0
                ::

                Hi @Wallon,
                Perhaps other members on the forum may have better suggestions.

                For me, I think the first thing I would try is to copy the ~/.config/google-chrome folder in the MX linux setup that has google-chrome working for you and copy to the antiX system that you have. (In any case, I would save that folder as a good backup because it has all your extensions and setup.) And then try to launch google-chrome and try it out. If it works, great.

                If not, try a different browser in your antiX system, like firefox or librewolf. And then try to do the speedtest. If it works, then the problem is unique to google-chrome on that antiX system.

                If trying other browsers produces a bad speedtest on this antiX system, then it may be your antiX system setup. In this case, I would back up important files and folders first. Then do a complete reinstall of antiX.

                This is just my own opinion.

                #84102
                Moderator
                Brian Masinick
                  Helpful
                  Up
                  0
                  ::

                  @Wallon: I’m sorry that you have been having issues with Chrome.

                  I’m not sure what your tolerance for problems and issues are, but when there are usable alternatives it may be more productive to use them, remove Chrome completely, and if you wish, take a month or two away and try again.

                  I’d understand completely if you forget it entirely.

                  --
                  Brian Masinick

                  #84103
                  Member
                  Wallon
                    Helpful
                    Up
                    0
                    ::

                    Dear Brian,

                    I have also the problem with Opera.
                    Please see the screenshoot.
                    Apparently, all Chromium-based browsers have a problem with the download in antiX.

                    Best regards,
                    Wallon

                    Attachments:
                    #84105
                    Moderator
                    Brian Masinick
                      Helpful
                      Up
                      0
                      ::

                      @Wallon: If you are having that many problems with Chrome-based browsers, maybe it’s time to see which browsers DO work effectively for you.

                      I don’t see the problems you have, but I’ve managed to put a few config changes into Palemoon 31.0.0 and it behaves similarly to Firefox with a somewhat smaller memory footprint. With the config changes, most other things, particularly using this forum and Webmail (which comprises the bulk of my computing activity these days), work nicely there, and also in Firefox, though I have no problems using Google Chrome, Chromium, or Ungoogled-Chromium.

                      I hope you find success with another alternative.

                      --
                      Brian Masinick

                      #84113
                      Member
                      blur13
                        Helpful
                        Up
                        0
                        ::

                        https://github.com/sivel/speedtest-cli

                        use the “Just download” install method and copy to $PATH ie /usr/local/bin/

                        That way you can test your speed independently of a browser and see if you notice an improvement.

                        For what its worth, I cant reproduce your error on antiX 19.5, I get the same speed (no drop-off at the end) using chrome and firefox.

                        #84126
                        Moderator
                        Brian Masinick
                          Helpful
                          Up
                          0
                          ::

                          You may be jealous of these results from my Firefox Nightly instance:

                          https://www.speedtest.net/result/13240227039

                          --
                          Brian Masinick

                          #84127
                          Moderator
                          Brian Masinick
                            Helpful
                            Up
                            0
                            ::

                            and this one was even better:

                            https://www.speedtest.net/result/13240237237

                            --
                            Brian Masinick

                            #84137
                            Member
                            Wallon
                              Helpful
                              Up
                              0
                              ::

                              Dear Brian,

                              I used an anti-XLive USB stick. I installed Google Chrome on the Live key.
                              The results are very good as you can see on the screenshot.
                              I have to install antiX again. I probably broke antiX with the tests for the FT10 package. I don’t know where this comes from.

                              In Wallonia, the internet providers give a standard contract for individuals with an upload speed of 6.5 Mbps (VOO provider) or 25 Mbps (Proximus provider).

                              We know that Belgium is underdeveloped compared to your country. This poses problems for economic development. We do not have any distance selling sites like Amazon for example. Moreover, night work is forbidden to prepare parcels! It’s a shame because the government says there are too many people unemployed but the government does nothing for economic development!

                              Best regards,
                              Wallon

                              #84142
                              Member
                              Wallon
                                Helpful
                                Up
                                0
                                ::

                                Dear All,

                                I have just done a new installation of antiX 21 full.
                                I installed Google Chrome without synchronisation, without any extension, without any bookmark.
                                Very big disappointment, the speedtest is bad.
                                I don’t understand why on a Live antiX 21 full USB stick, the speedtest with Google Chrome is excellent on a wired connection.
                                As soon as I do a fresh installation, the speedtest with Google Chrome is bad on wired connection.
                                Is there a change in the software that handles the internet between the installation ISO and an upgrade after installing antiX?

                                If you have an idea to share?

                                Best regards,
                                Wallon

                                #84143
                                Member
                                Wallon
                                  Helpful
                                  Up
                                  0
                                  ::

                                  Dear All,

                                  I have just received an update for connman.
                                  connman (1.40-1.0antix1 => 1.41-1.0antix1)
                                  I installed and rebooted my desktop.

                                  I did a new speedtest but it’s still bad with antiX 21 Full installed and Google Chrome.

                                  For information, I have exactly the same phenomenon on my old AMD laptop. I have antiX19.4 and the speedtest with Google Chrome is bad. If I use a live antiX21 key on the old laptop, the speedtest with Google Chrome is excellent!

                                  I have to thank the person who sent the new version of connman to see if the problem was there.

                                  As I have this problem on 2 computers, I will not be the only one to notice this curiosity.

                                  Best regards,
                                  Wallon

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)
                                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.