Forum › Forums › New users › New Users and General Questions › wine32 is missing [Solved]
- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated Mar 23-12:00 am by psionl0.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 20, 2023 at 9:33 am #102614Member
psionl0
I have been trying to use wine for a windows package but it appears to be incomplete. When I tried to run wine I got the message that wine32 is missing and needs to be installed. I tried to install wine32, it failed due to dependencies that the system refused to install.
I could not find any information on this web site about the situation and other web sites have information about different Debian Linux systems (like Ubuntu) and I am reluctant to try and adapt them to antiX. Can anybody help?
This is the output I got when running wine or trying to install wine32:
demo@antix1:~ $ winecfg it looks like wine32 is missing, you should install it. as root, please execute "apt-get install wine32" demo@antix1:~ $ sudo apt-get install wine32 [sudo] password for demo: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ca-certificates-java : Depends: default-jre-headless but it is not going to be installed or java8-runtime-headless wine32:i386 : Depends: libwine:i386 (= 4.0-2) but it is not going to be installed E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. demo@antix1:~ $- This topic was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by psionl0.
- This topic was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by psionl0.
- This topic was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by psionl0.
March 20, 2023 at 10:17 am #102620Moderator
caprea
March 20, 2023 at 10:48 am #102621Memberpsionl0
::$ inxi -Fzr System: Host: antix1 Kernel: 4.9.235-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: IceWM 1.8.3 Distro: antiX-19.3_x64-full Manolis Glezos 15 October 2020 Machine: Type: Desktop Mobo: Acer model: Aspire TC-605 serial: <filter> BIOS: American Megatrends v: P11-B3 date: 03/25/2015 CPU: Topology: Quad Core model: Intel Core i5-4460 bits: 64 type: MCP L2 cache: 6144 KiB Speed: 3197 MHz min/max: 800/3400 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 3197 2: 3200 3: 3200 4: 2913 Graphics: Device-1: NVIDIA GK208 [GeForce GT 710] driver: nouveau v: kernel Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.4 driver: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa resolution: 1366x768~60Hz OpenGL: renderer: NV108 v: 4.3 Mesa 18.3.6 Audio: Device-1: Intel 8 Series/C220 Series High Definition Audio driver: snd_hda_intel Device-2: NVIDIA GK208 HDMI/DP Audio driver: snd_hda_intel Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.9.235-antix.1-amd64-smp Network: Device-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet driver: r8169 IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter> Device-2: Qualcomm Atheros AR9462 Wireless Network Adapter driver: ath9k IF: wlan0 state: down mac: <filter> Drives: Local Storage: total: 938.89 GiB used: 160.67 GiB (17.1%) ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Western Digital model: WD10EZEX-21M2NA0 size: 931.51 GiB ID-2: /dev/sdb type: USB vendor: SanDisk model: Cruzer Blade size: 3.74 GiB ID-3: /dev/sdc type: USB vendor: Imation model: FlashDriv size: 3.64 GiB Partition: ID-1: / size: 6.20 GiB used: 3.79 GiB (61.2%) fs: overlay source: ERR-102 Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 29.8 C mobo: 27.8 C gpu: nouveau temp: 39 C Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A Repos: Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list 1: deb http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/buster/ buster main nonfree nosystemd Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/buster-backports.list 1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster-backports main contrib non-free Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list 1: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main contrib non-free Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 1: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ buster main contrib non-free 2: deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list 1: deb [arch=amd64] https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/onion.list Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp.list 1: deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo/ buster test Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp1.list 1: deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ buster main non-free No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list Info: Processes: 205 Uptime: 9h 42m Memory: 7.80 GiB used: 2.04 GiB (26.1%) Shell: bash inxi: 3.0.36 demo@antix1:~ $- This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by psionl0.
March 20, 2023 at 11:43 am #102628Moderator
caprea
::Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp.list
1: deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo/ buster test
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp1.list
1: deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ buster main non-freeThis is MX Linux repo and even MX Linux testrepo. Probably that is your problem.Please deactivate them.
Might your system is already completely mixed.Dependency problems are bound to happen.It may be possible to install a single package from MX, but after that the repos must always be deactivated immediately.The testrepo is to be taken on antiX yet with greater caution.March 20, 2023 at 12:36 pm #102634Memberpsionl0
March 20, 2023 at 1:58 pm #102639Moderator
caprea
::sudo geany /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp.list
Then in the file go to the line
deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo/ buster test
and comment it out like this
#deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo/ buster testThe same do for
sudo geany /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp1.list
the line
deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ buster main non-free
like this
#deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ buster main non-freeAfter closing and saving
sudo apt updateMarch 20, 2023 at 3:35 pm #102644Membermadibi
::@psionl0
dear,
have you tried to use the antiX app centre?
There the apps are expressly studied to fit with our OS.That solved a lot of problems of mine (also with wine).
Good luck 🙂
m- This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by madibi.
March 21, 2023 at 1:21 am #102672Memberpsionl0
::It would appear that the problem isn’t solved:
demo@antix1:~ $ sudo geany /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp.list [sudo] password for demo: demo@antix1:~ $ sudo geany /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp1.list demo@antix1:~ $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp.list #deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo/ buster test demo@antix1:~ $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pitemp1.list #deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ buster main non-free demo@antix1:~ $ sudo apt update Hit:1 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-backports InRelease Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease Hit:4 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian buster InRelease Hit:5 https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable InRelease Get:6 http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/buster buster InRelease [27.5 kB] Err:6 http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/buster buster InRelease The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG DB36CDF3452F0C20 antiX (antix repo) <repo@antixlinux.com> Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/buster buster InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG DB36CDF3452F0C20 antiX (antix repo) <repo@antixlinux.com> E: The repository 'http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/buster buster InRelease' is not signed. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. demo@antix1:~ $ sudo apt-get install wine32 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ca-certificates-java : Depends: default-jre-headless but it is not going to be installed or java8-runtime-headless wine32:i386 : Depends: libwine:i386 (= 4.0-2) but it is not going to be installed E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. demo@antix1:~ $March 21, 2023 at 1:33 am #102673Memberpsionl0
::@madibi,
If you mean using the package updater from the control centre then that is always my first port of call.
For some packages like PC-BASIC and XPaint I had to seek external .deb packages but they installed without problems.
March 21, 2023 at 8:24 am #102689Membermadibi
::@psionl0
I apologize. I wasn’t clear enough.
The antiX app centre can be found both:
– through Menu -> Control Centre -> Software -> program install (sorry, this is an approximate translation from Italian) in any case this program has a rectangular icon that looks like a suitcase, and it has a downward pointing arrow
– in the tray: you can find the above described icon close to the menu.When you open it needs the root pw, then you can search the program that you are interested in through a name research, and then you only have to wait for the end of the process.
I verified in some cases that using synaptic I had problems in installing wine. The issues disappeared using the installation software app.
Good luck 🙂
m
March 21, 2023 at 11:41 am #102707Memberpsionl0
::@madibi Yes that is what I am about too. Except in English it is Menu->Control Center->System->Package Installer. All of the wine packages from there are installed (except for wine32).
March 21, 2023 at 2:47 pm #102733Member
techore
::If the Package Installer works, awesome. However, another option is to enable 32 bit architecture and install wine32.
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 sudo apt update && sudo apt install wine32This approach may require ‘apt reinstall’ for dependencies to install 32 bit libraries and you may have 32 bit packages installed moving forward that you may or may not want. It’s a bit of a pickle but it is doable.
March 22, 2023 at 12:10 am #102817Moderator
caprea
::Reading package lists… Done
W: GPG error: http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/buster buster InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG DB36CDF3452F0C20 antiX (antix repo) <repo@antixlinux.com>
E: The repository ‘http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/buster buster InRelease’ is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can’t be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user conYou have to fix that first. Please look here
https://www.antixforum.com/forums/topic/how-to-update-antix-19/Afterwards look if you can update without the GPG error.Then try to install wine32 again.
March 22, 2023 at 12:54 am #102818Memberpsionl0
::@caprea
I changed the repo list as recommended:
$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list # Use with Debian Stable/buster repositories. Set as default for antiX-19. deb http://mxlinux.mirrors.uk2.net/packages/antix/buster/ buster main nonfree nosystemd # deb http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/buster/ buster main nonfree nosystemd # deb-src http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/buster/ buster main nonfree nosystemd # Use with Debian Testing/'rolling' repositories. # deb http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/testing/ testing main nonfree nosystemd # deb-src http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/testing/ testing main nonfree nosystemd # Use with Debian Sid repositories. # deb http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/sid/ sid main nonfree nosystemd # deb-src http://la.mxrepo.com/antix/sid/ sid main nonfree nosystemdUnfortunately, the problem still seems to be the same:
$ sudo apt update . . . . . . . . . Get:14 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-backports/main Translation-en [411 kB] Err:8 http://mxlinux.mirrors.uk2.net/packages/antix/buster buster InRelease The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG DB36CDF3452F0C20 antiX (antix repo) <repo@antixlinux.com> . . . . . . . . . . . Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: http://mxlinux.mirrors.uk2.net/packages/antix/buster buster InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG DB36CDF3452F0C20 antiX (antix repo) <repo@antixlinux.com> E: The repository 'http://mxlinux.mirrors.uk2.net/packages/antix/buster buster InRelease' is not signed. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.- This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by psionl0.
- This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by psionl0.
- This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by psionl0.
March 22, 2023 at 10:21 pm #102912Moderator
caprea
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.